2015
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1400217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why resilience is unappealing to social science: Theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience

Abstract: Pluralism drawing on core social scientific concepts would facilitate integrated sustainability research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
377
0
15

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 562 publications
(436 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
9
377
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are criticisms of the feasibility of such concepts when operationalizing them, due to possible constraints to capacities caused by poverty, weak institutions, or unproductive environments, among other examples (Jauhola 2015). There also have been sustained criticisms regarding the applicability of resilience in the social sciences more broadly due to its possible role in depoliticizing complex social-political causes of vulnerability (Olsson et al 2015).…”
Section: Towards a Causal Disaster Vulnerability Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there are criticisms of the feasibility of such concepts when operationalizing them, due to possible constraints to capacities caused by poverty, weak institutions, or unproductive environments, among other examples (Jauhola 2015). There also have been sustained criticisms regarding the applicability of resilience in the social sciences more broadly due to its possible role in depoliticizing complex social-political causes of vulnerability (Olsson et al 2015).…”
Section: Towards a Causal Disaster Vulnerability Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, trying to measure resilience remains conceptually challenging (Olsson et al 2015). The most prevalent method is to use a baseline of pre-event function and then measure subsequent change to provide insight into how the disaster, as a discrete event, directly impacts, for example, health, infrastructure, and food systems along with social response mechanisms.…”
Section: Towards a Causal Disaster Vulnerability Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some contributions to what we call the PE:SES debate take a positive view by arguing that there are synergies to be reaped by combining the two approaches (Armitage 2007), while others (usually of the PE persuasion) take a more critical stance that hones in on what are seen as flaws or shortfalls in the opposing approach (Nadasdy 2007;Olsson et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interdisciplinary researchers that study adapting to climate change and reducing disaster risk promote the social-ecological resilience paradigm. They state that resilience is the outcome of successful adaptation, which is a product of governments, enterprises, civil society organisations, households, and individuals with strong adaptive capacity.(UN-Habitat, 2011a).According to Olsson et al (2015), the concept of resiliency has attracted criticism from some researchers. Owing to its malleability in science combined with its popularity among powerful private and public actors, there is a risk of (un)intentional scientific justification of particular policies, projects, and practices (Olsson et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%