2017
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why People with More Emotion Regulation Difficulties Made a More Deontological Judgment: The Role of Deontological Inclinations

Abstract: Previous studies have demonstrated the key role of emotion in moral judgment, and explored the relationship between emotion regulation and moral judgment. The present study investigated the influence of individual differences in emotion regulation difficulties on moral judgment. Study 1 examined whether individuals with high emotion regulation difficulties made a more deontological judgment. Study 2 explored the underlying mechanism using a process-dissociation approach, examining whether deontological inclina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, deontological judgment involves emotional reactions (Greene et al, 2001, Greene et al, 2004McDonald et al, 2017;Szekely & Miu, 2015;Zhang, Li et al, 2017). It is generally considered that thoughts of deliberate harmful actions invoke a negative emotional response that leads to moral disapproval (Greene, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, deontological judgment involves emotional reactions (Greene et al, 2001, Greene et al, 2004McDonald et al, 2017;Szekely & Miu, 2015;Zhang, Li et al, 2017). It is generally considered that thoughts of deliberate harmful actions invoke a negative emotional response that leads to moral disapproval (Greene, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major tendency to follow utilitarian decisions has been predicted by personality traits (mostly persons with individualistic rather than collective traits) 91 and by emotion regulation and cognitive control mechanisms. 93 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Article follow utilitarian decisions has been predicted by personality traits (mostly persons with individualistic rather than collective traits) 91 and by emotion regulation and cognitive control mechanisms. 93 Appetitive and retaliatory DoVs shared a similar group of factors underlying the classification. Most of the top 20 PPVs for both DoVs were social-contextual factors, including the presence of social adversities, the normalization of violence, and membership identification.…”
Section: Ll Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Stress results in the dominance of fast, automatic and emotional intuitions ( Yu, 2016 ). Deontological inclinations and utilitarian inclinations are rooted in emotional reactions to harmful action, and deliberative analyses on the cost-benefit of the outcome of adverse action ( Greene, 2007 ; Conway and Gawronski, 2013 ; Zhang et al, 2017b ). Therefore, stress was associated with deontological inclinations, but had nothing to do with utilitarian inclinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%