1994
DOI: 10.1021/ic00094a030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Nickel(II) Binds CO Best in Trigonal Bipyramidal and Square Pyramidal Geometries and Possible Consequences for CO Dehydrogenase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ni(II) centers of intermediates 1 (Figure ), 2 , 3 , and 4 (Figure ) are four‐coordinate square planar structures. Notably, Crabtree and coworkers assigned the environment around Ni(II) in 2 to be five‐coordinate, partially due to the lack of precedence at the time for a four‐coordinate Ni(II)‐carbonyl species and the suggestion from an extended Hückel study that Ni(II)‐carbonyl complexes could be pentacoordinated since such a configuration could enhance π‐back bonding interactions between Ni(II) and CO . Nevertheless, the DFT level of theory does not support any Ni(II) pentacoordinated structure with the iminothiolate ligand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ni(II) centers of intermediates 1 (Figure ), 2 , 3 , and 4 (Figure ) are four‐coordinate square planar structures. Notably, Crabtree and coworkers assigned the environment around Ni(II) in 2 to be five‐coordinate, partially due to the lack of precedence at the time for a four‐coordinate Ni(II)‐carbonyl species and the suggestion from an extended Hückel study that Ni(II)‐carbonyl complexes could be pentacoordinated since such a configuration could enhance π‐back bonding interactions between Ni(II) and CO . Nevertheless, the DFT level of theory does not support any Ni(II) pentacoordinated structure with the iminothiolate ligand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11] Despite this, catalytically active Ni(II)-alkyl species may likely exhibit or transition through different coordination geometries. [12][13][14] For example, other synthetic Ni(II) complexes can be found in tetrahedral geometries in addition to the more common square planar geometries. While a square planar geometry is favored due to electronic stabilization of the d 8 Ni(II) ion, a tetrahedral geometry may be favored with suitably bulky or chelating ligands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a fair number of Ni II carbonyl complexes have been prepared. Most of these complexes are five‐coordinate, an observation that has been theoretically justified in terms of a more efficient π back‐donation from the Ni II center to the CO ligand 37. In fact, five‐coordinate nickel monocarbonyl derivatives containing the CO ligand in either axial or equatorial positions, show low‐frequency ν (CO) values as for instance in ( TBPY ‐5‐23)‐[NiI 2 (CO)(fdma)] (fdma=ferrocene‐1,1′‐bis(dimethylarsine); ν (CO)=2054 cm −1 ),38 ( TBPY ‐5‐22)‐[NiI 2 (CO)(PMe 3 ) 2 ] ( ν (CO)=2015 cm −1 )31 and ( TBPY ‐5‐13)‐[Ni(PP 3 E)(CO)] 2+ (PP 3 E=tris{2‐(diethylphosphino)ethyl}phosphine; ν (CO)=2050 cm −1 ) 39.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the tricarbonyl derivative ( TBPY ‐5‐11)‐[Ni(SiCl 3 ) 2 (CO) 3 ], the ν (CO) absorption appears at 2079 cm −1 33. In a square‐planar geometry, the σ‐nonbonding Ni(d π ) orbitals have been calculated to be low in energy and thus to be inefficient π‐donor orbitals 37. This statement, however, should be taken with great care, since in the anionic compounds 4 and 5 as well as in the few square‐planar precedents reported, the ν (CO) values observed suggest a significant degree of π back‐donation, see: trans ‐[Ni(C 6 Cl 5 )(PR 3 ) 2 (CO)] + (PR 3 =PPhMe 2 , PPh 2 Me; ν (CO)=2100 cm −1 )40 and [Ni(SePh) 3− x (SPh) x (CO)] − ( x =0, 1, 2; ν (CO)∼2030 cm −1 ) 29, 30.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%