2004
DOI: 10.5840/soctheorpract20043014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Monist Critiques Feed Value Pluralism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pero tal planteamiento, como decimos, no se corresponde con el pluralismo de Berlin. 15 Véase la crítica de Plaw a Dworkin a este respecto (Plaw, 2004).…”
Section: Conclusiones: Pluralismo Frente a Relativismounclassified
“…Pero tal planteamiento, como decimos, no se corresponde con el pluralismo de Berlin. 15 Véase la crítica de Plaw a Dworkin a este respecto (Plaw, 2004).…”
Section: Conclusiones: Pluralismo Frente a Relativismounclassified
“…I briefly draw attention to just one more here. Incommensurability may be seen as involving the possibility of disagreement even given reasonable reflection: ‘Incommensurability marks a practical limit on the power of reason alone to decide value conflicts’ (Plaw, 2004, p. 113). As stated, this is compatible with a Humean approach to normativity but Plaw likens political judgments involving incommensurability in this sense to aesthetic judgments and he clearly does not think of the latter as merely subjective.…”
Section: Incomparability and Incommensurabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%