The Quest for the Good Life 2015
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746980.003.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Is Aristotle’s Vicious Person Miserable?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NE III.5 1114a13-14, Broadie (1991: 161), and Anscombe's notion of 'idle' wishes (1957: 67). 19 Grönroos (2015a) wants something stronger: a vicious agent who acts against her preferential choice. This, however, is problematic.…”
Section: The Prospect Of Change For the Discontented Vicious Agentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NE III.5 1114a13-14, Broadie (1991: 161), and Anscombe's notion of 'idle' wishes (1957: 67). 19 Grönroos (2015a) wants something stronger: a vicious agent who acts against her preferential choice. This, however, is problematic.…”
Section: The Prospect Of Change For the Discontented Vicious Agentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He suffers, from time to time, from self-hate and regret, and he destroys himself in the end. On Aristotle's strict conception, these are the results of the specific motivational disunity of the non-virtuous (seeGrönroos, 2015). However, as I mention in the Concluding Remarks, Aristotle may have had too idealised a view of the motivational unity of the virtuous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%