2016
DOI: 10.31273/fd.n1.2016.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Feminist Dissent?

Abstract: This essay lays out the historical and intellectual lineage of the idea behind the journal Feminist Dissent. As the "Rushdie Affair" was both the backdrop and the catalyst for a group such as Women Against Fundamentalism, the current conjuncture characterized by an exponential expansion of fundamentalism, neo-liberal austerity, rollback of the rights of women and sexual minorities, and racist control of borders and migration has necessitated a different kind of analysis, one that is absent from academic and po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While feminist literature is replenished with cases of women's dissent (from Okely 1990, to Varma et al 2016, the position (un)claimed by Pakistani women in Italy combines resistance to 'gender and racial profiling' at once, as they try to defy the intersectional vulnerability that tears apart their bodies and subjectivities. Scholars in feminist philosophy and legal theory (Mckenzie et al 2014) acknowledge a common primary human vulnerability that emerges from the relational interdependence of our existence: however, vulnerability is not evenly distributed but is often the outcome of multidimensional systems of structural social inequality.…”
Section: Preliminary Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While feminist literature is replenished with cases of women's dissent (from Okely 1990, to Varma et al 2016, the position (un)claimed by Pakistani women in Italy combines resistance to 'gender and racial profiling' at once, as they try to defy the intersectional vulnerability that tears apart their bodies and subjectivities. Scholars in feminist philosophy and legal theory (Mckenzie et al 2014) acknowledge a common primary human vulnerability that emerges from the relational interdependence of our existence: however, vulnerability is not evenly distributed but is often the outcome of multidimensional systems of structural social inequality.…”
Section: Preliminary Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Religious fundamentalism and women's rights are usually seen as mutually hostile forces (Varma et al, 2016). Examining religion and women's rights in South Asia shows that their relationship needs to be understood in the context of postcolonial nationalism rather than in terms of the politics of fundamentalism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It aimed to shape debates about how to ensure the freedoms of both women and religious people in multicultural Europe. Some feminist scholars, including Patel (2013), Yuval-Davis (2014), Badinter (2003) and Varma et al, (2016), argue that a form of secularism is the best way to ensure gender equality. They argue that allowing religious organisations political power enshrines gender inequality through state support for religious cultural practices that harm women (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plusieurs érudits féministes, notamment Patel (2013), Yuval-Davis (2014), Badinter (2003) et Varma, Dhaliwal et Nagarajan (2016), soutiennent qu'une certaine forme de laïcité est le meilleur moyen d'assurer l'égalité homme-femme. Ils affirment qu'accorder un pouvoir politique aux organisations religieuses consacre l'inégalité entre les sexes à travers le soutien de l'État à des pratiques culturelles religieuses qui nuisent aux femmes (par ex.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified