Why Does the Law of One Price Fail? An Experiment on Index Mutual Funds

Abstract

We conduct an experiment to evaluate why individuals invest in high-fee index funds. In our experiments, subjects allocate $10,000 across four S&P 500 index funds and are rewarded for their portfolio’s subsequent return. Subjects overwhelmingly fail to minimize fees. We can reject the hypothesis that subjects buy high-fee index funds because of bundled non-portfolio services. Search costs for fees matter, but even when we eliminate these costs, fees are not minimized. Instead, subjects place high weight on annualized returns since inception. Fees paid decrease with financial literacy. Interestingly, subjects who choose high-fee funds sense they are making a mistake.

Platform adoption in system markets: The roles of preference heterogeneity and consumer expectations

“…8 Extant research suggests that consumers often face difficulties forming reasonable expectations. For instance, multiple studies show that consumers fail to look ahead and are unable to predict their choices' influence on financial investments' outcomes (Benartzi & Thaler, 2007;Beshears, Choi, Laibson, & Madrian, 2011;Choi, Laibson, & Madrian, 2010).…”

Measuring Investors’ Socially Responsible Preferences in Mutual Funds

“…Johnson and Tellis (2005) also study the same phenomenon experimentally, but with reference to stocks. Choi et al (2006) design an experiment to study the role of commissions in fund investment, finding that to a large extent they are overlooked, even when they are pointed out in the information provided. 7 The number of 31 scenarios was chosen as a compromise between producing high return differentials, up to 100%, in small steps and obtaining a reasonable duration of the experiment for the participants: 2 h.…”

Buyer confusion and market prices

“…Hossain and Morgan (2006) and Brown et al, (2010) show that buyers underestimate the shipping costs on eBay auctions. Choi et al (2010) show that investors fail to minimize on mutual fund fees (for a recent review, see DellaVigna, 2009). …”