2012
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tps044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why does leaf nitrogen decline within tree canopies less rapidly than light? An explanation from optimization subject to a lower bound on leaf mass per area

Abstract: A long-established theoretical result states that, for a given total canopy nitrogen (N) content, canopy photosynthesis is maximized when the within-canopy gradient in leaf N per unit area (N(a)) is equal to the light gradient. However, it is widely observed that N(a) declines less rapidly than light in real plant canopies. Here we show that this general observation can be explained by optimal leaf acclimation to light subject to a lower-bound constraint on the leaf mass per area (m(a)). Using a simple model o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This study also showed clear differences in SLA across different species due to individual species characteristics (Table 3), and SLA was smaller for upper than lower canopy species in all plots. This is caused by the strong negative correlation between SLA and the amount of light, and is consistent with the results of shading experiments for seedlings or understory trees showing high SLAs [32][33][34][35][36]. In particular, the present study showed that S. alnifolias, which grew in the lower canopy in GN and the upper canopy in GRW, showed 55.7% difference in SLA (GN 297.7 cm −2 ·g −1 ; and GRW 191.2 cm −2 ·g −1 ).…”
Section: Temporal and Interspecific Variation Of Slasupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This study also showed clear differences in SLA across different species due to individual species characteristics (Table 3), and SLA was smaller for upper than lower canopy species in all plots. This is caused by the strong negative correlation between SLA and the amount of light, and is consistent with the results of shading experiments for seedlings or understory trees showing high SLAs [32][33][34][35][36]. In particular, the present study showed that S. alnifolias, which grew in the lower canopy in GN and the upper canopy in GRW, showed 55.7% difference in SLA (GN 297.7 cm −2 ·g −1 ; and GRW 191.2 cm −2 ·g −1 ).…”
Section: Temporal and Interspecific Variation Of Slasupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Norway spruce, Picea abies (L.) Karst., dominated the stand (82 % of the basal area, BA) but Scots pine, Pinus sylvestris L. (13 % of BA), and Silver birch, Betula pendula Roth (5 % of BA), were also present. The dominant and co-dominant Norway spruce trees were 22-25 m in height and the average LAI was 5.1 m 2 m −2 at the bottom of the living crown in May 2007 (Dewar et al 2012). The field vegetation was dominated by bryophytes with sparse vascular plants, including species such as Luzula pilosa and Oxalis acetosella.…”
Section: Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Vitousek et al, 2010), 흡수된 양분의 분배는 수관 내 양분 요구 도, 광의 분포 등에 영향을 받게 된다 (Dewar et al, 2012;Kobe et al, 2005;Niinemets, 2012). 또한 낙엽이 지기 전에 잎의 양분을 소지를 비롯한 영구조 직으로 재흡수하여, 양분의 이용효율을 높이는 재전류 는 토양의 비옥도, 광환경, 수종 및 천이 단계에 따라 영향을 받게 된다 (Kobe et al, 2005;Yan et al, 2006;Yan et al, 2013).…”
Section: 질소와 인은 식물체 내에서 단백질 핵산 엽록소를unclassified
“…1). 잎의 질소량과 그 분배는 흔히 빛의 양과 밀접한 양의 상 관관계를 가지며 (Dewar et al, 2012;Field, 1983;Hirose and Werger, 1987;Huang. J. et al, 2007;Niinemets, 2012;Peltoniemi et al, 2012) (Minotta and Pinzauti, 1996).…”
Section: Lma와 엽록소 함량unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation