2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2013.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why do U.S. states adopt public–private partnership enabling legislation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DA is a hazard-based duration model and represents a class of analytical methods which are appropriate for modelling data that have as their focus, an end-of-duration occurrence, given that the duration has lasted to some specified time (Hensher and Mannering 1994). This method has been used previously in empirical models of unemployment duration (Arulampalam and Stewart 1995), self-employment duration (Taylor 1999), the adoption of PPP enabling legislation within US states (Geddes and Wagner 2013) and local government tenure length (Castro and Martins 2013). Specifically within our study, DA facilitated studying the time (in months) between a project contract notice and project contract award/financial close.…”
Section: Data Collection and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DA is a hazard-based duration model and represents a class of analytical methods which are appropriate for modelling data that have as their focus, an end-of-duration occurrence, given that the duration has lasted to some specified time (Hensher and Mannering 1994). This method has been used previously in empirical models of unemployment duration (Arulampalam and Stewart 1995), self-employment duration (Taylor 1999), the adoption of PPP enabling legislation within US states (Geddes and Wagner 2013) and local government tenure length (Castro and Martins 2013). Specifically within our study, DA facilitated studying the time (in months) between a project contract notice and project contract award/financial close.…”
Section: Data Collection and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, there has clearly been a move from studying PPPs solely through a set of technical, formal and utilitarian objectives towards more socio‐political as well as informal objectives. Donahue and Zeckhauser () ask, for instance, what shared discretion means for parties, Brinkerhoff and Brinkerhoff () speak of good governance norms as integral to partnerships and Geddes and Wagner () examine how state enabling laws increase PPP investment. Fourth, there has been a transition whereby PPP research is coming from an increasing number of academic disciplines.…”
Section: Reconceptualising Ppp and Ppp Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies that focus on developing countries include Banerjee, Oetzel, and Ranganathan (2006), which found that institutional structure affects private investment in public infrastructure, in terms of the number of projects and the value of these investments. From a slightly different perspective, Geddes and Wagner (2013) conducted an empirical analysis of statistical associations between the passage of P3-enabling legislation in USA, which is an important institutional component of P3s, and various political and economic factors. As such, both case studies and statistical analyses have been employed by scholars to address research questions regarding P3 institutions.…”
Section: Institutional Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%