2015
DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2015.1076535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Review of Transportation Infrastructure Public–Private Partnership: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: The limited understanding of public-private partnerships (P3s) for transportation infrastructure finance has been generally attributed to a lack of data. The more fundamental question of how P3 data are utilized in the literature is more relevant and critical, but remains unclear. This study investigates this question by examining the linkages between research objectives and data characteristics through a meta-analysis of infrastructure P3 studies using multinomial regressions. It analyzes 95 empirical studies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Helby stated that the comparability between the treatment group and the control group is crucial [35]. Chen et al and Raisbeck et al argued that the case descriptions and small-N studies were too naive to be generalizable, and the investigation results were not sufficient [31,40]. Nevertheless, these methods have been widely used and are generally attributed to the limited availability of PPP data.…”
Section: E Evaluation Methods Of Ppp Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Helby stated that the comparability between the treatment group and the control group is crucial [35]. Chen et al and Raisbeck et al argued that the case descriptions and small-N studies were too naive to be generalizable, and the investigation results were not sufficient [31,40]. Nevertheless, these methods have been widely used and are generally attributed to the limited availability of PPP data.…”
Section: E Evaluation Methods Of Ppp Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the criteria of successful PPPs, government officials and scholars have considered PPP performance from different dimensions and perspectives [29]. e measures of the success of PPPs include cost, quality, schedule [30,31], stability assurance [32], and social welfare [33]. For example, Wang et al surveyed existing studies and found that PPP performance often cooccurs with the keywords value for money (VFM), cost, public value, and benefits [34].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andrews and Entwistle (2010) have found a partnership with private sector organizations to be negatively associated with effectiveness and equity. Availability and access to data is a major problem when it comes to the measurement of effectiveness in PPP projects (Chen, Daito, & Gifford, 2016). Different methods used to measure effectiveness are tabulated as under: Based on the variety of factors/ measurement methods as in Table: 9 these diverse measures/factors are categorized in the following 6 different categories: (Hayllar, 2010;Ofek, 2015;Higgins & Huque, 2015;Buse & Harmer, 2007;Hodge & Coghill, 2007;Panayides et al, 2015;Becker, 2012;Willem & Lucidarme, 2014;MacDonald, 2012;Wong et al, 2015;Buse & Harmer, 2007;Alasad & Motawa, 2016;Abramov, 2009a;Aaronson, 2011;Loosemore & Cheung, 2015) Sr No.…”
Section: Methods Used To Measure the Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a win-win situation includes options for revenue sharing [65,66]. Carbonara and Pellegrino [67] studied the optimal conditions required to achieve such a situation with various pairs of revenue ceiling and revenue floor, using the real option model.…”
Section: Ppp Success Factors and Risk Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%