International Handbook of Anger 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-89676-2_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Do I Get Angry? A Componential Appraisal Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Russell and Fehr [] pointed out that these common conceptions typically follow the classical approach to the definition of concepts, and hold that anger has definite characteristics, “each necessary and together sufficient to determine membership in the anger emotion category” (p. 186). (Conventional appraisal theorizing essentially also takes this position [e.g., see Wranik and Scherer, ]. One of the troublesome aspects here, though, as Russell and Fehr [] noted, is that the proponents of this common approach do not always agree as to just what are these defining features and just what are the causes of this emotional state (see p. 188).…”
Section: Anger From the Cognitive‐neoassociation Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Russell and Fehr [] pointed out that these common conceptions typically follow the classical approach to the definition of concepts, and hold that anger has definite characteristics, “each necessary and together sufficient to determine membership in the anger emotion category” (p. 186). (Conventional appraisal theorizing essentially also takes this position [e.g., see Wranik and Scherer, ]. One of the troublesome aspects here, though, as Russell and Fehr [] noted, is that the proponents of this common approach do not always agree as to just what are these defining features and just what are the causes of this emotional state (see p. 188).…”
Section: Anger From the Cognitive‐neoassociation Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…De este modo, los practicantes de actividad física y deporte que sintieron que su familia los apoyaba "sin duda", presentaron menores niveles de temperamento. Esto puede ser debido a que perciben que sus familiares les apoyan en su práctica deportiva, lo que podría relacionarse con una mejor gestión de sus emociones negativas y control de su temperamento (Lastre et al, 2017;Wranik y Scherer, 2010). Por lo tanto, el apoyo familiar en el deporte se muestra como una variable importante en los niveles de temperamento de los deportistas y practicantes de actividad física.…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified
“…Therefore, there have to be psychocultural mechanisms in the Culture of Honor that involve anger and rage, as already pointed out. Indeed, culture, society, and emotion have been found to be significantly interwined (Manstead, 2010), particularly with regards to mechanisms of individualism-collectivism, shame, anger, and violence (Gouveia and Clemente, 2000; Potegal and Novaco, 2010; Wranik and Scherer, 2010), these being the key mediators between social mores and criminal violence (Potegal and Novaco, 2010; Wranik and Scherer, 2010). It is, thus, necessary to ponder what role anger and its dynamics play within the Culture of Honor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also the fact that society and culture have been shown to significantly influence emotional dynamics and expression, especially regarding anger (Gouveia and Clemente, 2000; Potegal and Novaco, 2010; Wranik and Scherer, 2010). This suggests that the Hyperculture favors an enhanced tolerance of diversity, social interaction, and dialog, promoting communication, mutual understanding, and peaceful means of conflict resolution, thereby counteracting the mechanisms and processes through which it is considered that the Culture of Honor promotes homicide (Souza et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%