Why do gorillas make sequences of gestures?

Abstract

Great ape gestures have attracted considerable research interest in recent years, prompted by their flexible and intentional pattern of use; but almost all studies have focused on single gestures. Here, we report the first quantitative analysis of sequential gesture use in western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla), using data from three captive groups and one African study site. We found no evidence that gesture sequences were given for reasons of increased communicative efficiency over single gestures. Longer sequences of repeated gestures did not increase the likelihood of response, and using a sequence was seldom in reaction to communicative failure. Sequential combination of two gestures with similar meanings did not generally increase effectiveness, and sometimes reduced it. Gesture sequences were closely associated with play contexts. Markov transition analysis showed two networks of frequently co-occurring gestures, both consisting of gestures used to regulate play. One network comprised only tactile gestures, the other a mix of silent, audible and tactile gestures; apparently, these clusters resulted from gesture use in play with proximal or distal contact, respectively. No evidence was found for syntactic effects of sequential combination: meanings changed little or not at all. Semantically, many gestures overlapped massively with others in their core information (i.e. message), and gesture messages spanned relatively few functions. We suggest that the underlying semantics of gorilla gestures is highly simplified compared to that of human words. Gesture sequences allow continual adjustment of the tempo and nature of social interactions, rather than generally conveying semantically referential information or syntactic structures.

Actions speak louder than words in socially foraging human groups

“…5,6 Since language is based on the same underlying cognitive and social skills that facilitate collaborative activities in the absence of explicit communication, 3,7 our experimental results compliment studies of human collective behavior in other contexts. Recent works on human crowds have demonstrated that complex patterns of human collective behavior can occur in the absence of explicit signaling, with…”

Human–animal relationships in zoo‐housed orangutans (P. abelii) and gorillas (G. g. gorilla): The effects of familiarity

“…These were the most difficult to identify observationally because it was difficult to differentiate aggression (i.e., threat of violence) from aggressive play or bids for attention. For example, 19 of these 30 cases closely resembled behaviors used by immature gorillas in play or to gain attention, such as wall or glass drumming [Genty & Byrne, 2009]. While adult male apes' aggressive behaviors were consistent with predictions, behaviors coded as aggressive in adult females and immatures were difficult to interpret relative to predictions.…”

A word in the hand: action, gesture and mental representation in humans and non-human primates

“…However, there is no indication that these sequences of gestures are combined according to systematic patterns-either to attract attention before communicating a particular desire, or to communicate a more complex meaning than is possible using a single gesture. Apes' gesture combinations are typically either repetitions of the same gesture or different types of gestures with the same meaning [83,84].…”