2019
DOI: 10.1177/0308275x19842913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why didn’t you write this in your diary? Or how nurses (mis)used clinic diaries to (re)claim shared reflexive spaces in Senegal

Abstract: Between 2015 and 2017, we implemented the clinic diaries project as part of the qualitative component of an evaluation of a supply chain intervention for family planning in Senegal. This project combined different tools including the diaries and participatory workshops with nurses. At the intersection between writings and silences, this paper explores the role played by the clinic diaries to mediate ethnographic encounters, and the iterative nature of ‘doing fieldwork’ to produce knowledge in hierarchical heal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Who writes what down, who makes the record and how, are key ethical portals. Shared participation in diaries and mapping chart the limits of the ethnographer’s neutrality, objectivity and responsibility (Duclos et al 2019; Anthia 2019). Malinowski’s principles are also invoked by Bierschenk and de Sardan (2019), who urge awareness and caution in respect of what they call ‘ideological populism’, the ethnographer’s instinctive antihegemonic stance which inclines to deny the bureaucrat the same status and rights as a subject that are granted to so‐called ‘clients’ or what Malinowski might have termed ‘natives’.…”
Section: Borders Bureaucracy and Everyday Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Who writes what down, who makes the record and how, are key ethical portals. Shared participation in diaries and mapping chart the limits of the ethnographer’s neutrality, objectivity and responsibility (Duclos et al 2019; Anthia 2019). Malinowski’s principles are also invoked by Bierschenk and de Sardan (2019), who urge awareness and caution in respect of what they call ‘ideological populism’, the ethnographer’s instinctive antihegemonic stance which inclines to deny the bureaucrat the same status and rights as a subject that are granted to so‐called ‘clients’ or what Malinowski might have termed ‘natives’.…”
Section: Borders Bureaucracy and Everyday Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%