2003
DOI: 10.1162/003465303765299819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Cooperate? Public Goods, Economic Power, and the Montreal Protocol

Abstract: This paper develops a correlated probit model to describe dichotomous choices that may contain a public-goods component or some other forms of interdependency. The key contribution of the paper is to formulate tests for interdependent behavior among agents. In particular, we examine the decisions by nations whether or not to ratify the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. Specifically, we reject free riding as a motive for not ratifying the Protocol, and we find little evidence that in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Beron, Murdoch, & Vijverberg, 2003). Economic coercions are an important part of statecraft that can work more effectively than military actions in the context of increasing economic globalization (Drezner, 2003).…”
Section: Hypothesis 2: the Strength Of Home-host Political Relations mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beron, Murdoch, & Vijverberg, 2003). Economic coercions are an important part of statecraft that can work more effectively than military actions in the context of increasing economic globalization (Drezner, 2003).…”
Section: Hypothesis 2: the Strength Of Home-host Political Relations mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58. Beron et al 2003;Congleton 1992;Frank 1999;Fredriksson et al 2007;Murdoch et al 2003;Neumayer 2002a;Perrin and Bernauer 2010;Roberts et al 2004;von 19731973-20021973-20021973-2000 371.97*** 822.03*** 826.94*** 10,360.02*** crease in the estimated risk of ratiªcation. Yet, only Models 3 and 4 include the interaction term that directly tests our argument.…”
Section: Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two dominant techniques, both based on simulation methods, for the estimation of the spatial lag model are the frequentist recursive importance sampling (RIS) estimator (which is a generalization of the more familiar GewekeHajivassiliou-Keane or GHK simulator; see Beron et al, 2003 andVijverberg, 2004) and The next section presents the model formulation for both the spatial lag and spatial error structures, while Section 3.2 discusses model estimation.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%