2012
DOI: 10.1037/a0026610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Can't We All Just Get Along? Evolutionary Perspectives on Violence, Homicide, and War

Abstract: We review and discuss the evolutionary psychological literature on violence, homicide, and war in humans and nonhumans, and in doing so argue that an evolutionary perspective can substantially enhance our understanding of these behaviors. We provide a brief primer on evolutionary psychology, describing the basic tenets of the field. The theories of sexual selection and parental investment are explained and subsequently used to highlight the evolutionary logic underlying the use of violence by humans and other … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us take aggressiveness as an example of an aspect of human nature for which there are still many unanswered questions (Buss and Dentley, 2006; Buss and Shackelford, 1997; Liddle, Shackelford, and Weeks-Shackelford, 2012). Two such questions are: why is it that humans seem to have a high potential for violent aggression toward their conspecifics?…”
Section: Understanding the Evolution Of Human Nature: The Importance mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us take aggressiveness as an example of an aspect of human nature for which there are still many unanswered questions (Buss and Dentley, 2006; Buss and Shackelford, 1997; Liddle, Shackelford, and Weeks-Shackelford, 2012). Two such questions are: why is it that humans seem to have a high potential for violent aggression toward their conspecifics?…”
Section: Understanding the Evolution Of Human Nature: The Importance mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive overviews of the different forms, motivations and outcomes of violent intergroup conflicts present in human ( pre-)history can be found in the literature [6,[43][44][45]. Notable are Keeley's descriptions of societies whose different subgroups constantly engage in violent conflicts, but do not aim at their enemies' total annihilation [6].…”
Section: (C) Anthropological Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption was found empirically to work well for small coalitions of males in primates, wolves, and lions (Bissonnette et al 2009;Liddle et al 2012). It is probably too conservative in that chimpanzees' total fighting ability increases more than linearly with the number of individuals that join (Wilson et al 2002), but this merely means that our results are likely to be somewhat conservative.…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 41%