2006
DOI: 10.1017/s1049096506060550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Bother? Because Peer-to-Peer Programs Can Mobilize Young Voters

Abstract: Many assume that young Americans are apathetic, self-absorbed, and indifferent to civic matters. It is a turned-off generation, we are told. But nothing could be further from the truth. A host of data suggests young Americans give their energy, time, and money to their schools, community, and nation. A recent report by the Center for Information and Res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whatever moniker they use, scholars generally agree that this new generation has experienced "an unmistakable expansion of youth interest in politics and public affairs" (Sander & Putnam 2010, p. 11). In fact, young people in this generation have been found to volunteer much more than older Americans (Shea & Harris 2006; see also Zukin et al 2006). Moreover, voter turnout for Americans under 30 has gone up significantly in recent years: "turnout increased 4% by 2000, and an additional 7% in 2004" (Dalton 2008, p. 192), and this trend continued in the 2008 election (Kirby & Kawashima-Ginsberg 2009, Sander & Putnam 2010).…”
Section: Understanding Generational Shifts In Youth Political Particimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whatever moniker they use, scholars generally agree that this new generation has experienced "an unmistakable expansion of youth interest in politics and public affairs" (Sander & Putnam 2010, p. 11). In fact, young people in this generation have been found to volunteer much more than older Americans (Shea & Harris 2006; see also Zukin et al 2006). Moreover, voter turnout for Americans under 30 has gone up significantly in recent years: "turnout increased 4% by 2000, and an additional 7% in 2004" (Dalton 2008, p. 192), and this trend continued in the 2008 election (Kirby & Kawashima-Ginsberg 2009, Sander & Putnam 2010).…”
Section: Understanding Generational Shifts In Youth Political Particimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). Presenting findings from data collected in 2002, Andolina and colleagues (2003, p. 275) conclude that "habits formed at home, lessons learned at school, and opportunities offered by outside groups all positively influence the civic engagement of youth" (see also Shea & Harris 2006 for their study of peer-to-peer programs). In his piece in the Annual Review of Political Science, Galston (2001) compares traditional classroom-based civic education to service learning, which combines community-based learning with classroom experience.…”
Section: Gender and Racementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, we have done a number of things in the PCS program to address these concerns and to ensure that our goals of politically engaged students remain at the forefront. As some have noted, when it comes specifically to direct political engagement, students need to be exposed to such things as voter mobilization, electoral mobilization (Bennion 2006) as well as peer-to-peer voter registration programs (Shea and Harris 2006).…”
Section: The Citizens Scholars Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalton (), and others, argue it is not that youth are disengaged, but rather that they do not engage in the same way that “dutiful” generations have. Instead, youth have shifted to an “engaged citizenship” model by volunteering (Shea & Harris, ), protesting, and embedding politics in their daily lives (Schlozman, Verba, & Brady, ; Zukin, Keeter, Andolina, Jenkins, & Delli Carpini, ). Youth also engage in participatory politics, in which political news and opinions are expressed, consumed, and remixed peer‐to‐peer through online social networks (Cohen, Kahne, Bowyer, Middaugh, & Rogowski, )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%