2016
DOI: 10.1002/hast.542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Bioethics Has a Race Problem

Abstract: In the September‐October 2001 issue of the Hastings Center Report, editor Gregory Kaebnick encouraged bioethicists to turn their attention toward “easily overlooked, relatively little‐talked‐about societal topics” such as race. In 2000 the president of the American Society for Bioethics had called for a more socially conscious bioethics. Race was risky territory, Kaebnick pointed out, but this challenge did not justify avoidance. Over the next fifteen years, the response to this editor's invitation to examine … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2016, John Hoberman argued that “[b]ioethicists have not embraced the opportunity to create a sociologically and historically informed bioethics that might be applied to the lives of [racial minorities] and their unending health crisis” (Hoberman 2016 , 13). Indeed, the issue of institutional racism represents a long overdue topic of interest that requires attention within the discipline.…”
Section: Overview Of the Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2016, John Hoberman argued that “[b]ioethicists have not embraced the opportunity to create a sociologically and historically informed bioethics that might be applied to the lives of [racial minorities] and their unending health crisis” (Hoberman 2016 , 13). Indeed, the issue of institutional racism represents a long overdue topic of interest that requires attention within the discipline.…”
Section: Overview Of the Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite excellent scholarship and advocacy within bioethics, for the most part racism has been treated as a peripheral issue in mainstream bioethics discourse and generally has only been seen as central in seminal cases like the Tuskegee syphilis experiments. In support of this observation, authors including John Hoberman argue that a "fascination with Tuskegee" and other horrific events have truncated our awareness of the history, depth, and systemic character of American racism that goes beyond the events that occupy our political consciousness (Hoberman 2016). Instead of addressing oppression and violence as central and endemic issues within American society, bioethical literature prefers to consider race in "euphemistically tinged abstractions" such as "health care disparities," "minority health care," or "social justice" (Baker 2016).…”
Section: Discourses Of Marginalization In Bioethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioethics has a race problem, had argued the medical historian John Hoberman 5 , specialized in the history of medical racism. Hoberman researched the academic production of medicine and bioethics to trace the place of race in the field.…”
Section: Ethical Praxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at the prestigious Hastings Centre Report publications from 2001 to 2016, he found just one article which covered race and medicine in a broad sense 5 (12), that is, that did not deal with cases considered exceptional or focused on historical periods of overt racism, giving the impression that racism is something from the past. The same absence can be found in the American Journal of Bioethics, which in fifteen years has produced four articles or essays focused on race and medicine 5 (12).…”
Section: Ethical Praxismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation