2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why are you so tolerant? Towards the relationship between consumer expectations and level of involvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears that in this context, disconfirmation sensitivity represents a type of involvement or importance of food in the individuals' lives. Previous studies suggested that involvement could contribute to heightened expectations (Pereira Filho & Moreno Añez, 2021), which supports this finding. Contrary to previous research, the expected negative effect of disconfirmation sensitivity on expectations did not occur in either sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It appears that in this context, disconfirmation sensitivity represents a type of involvement or importance of food in the individuals' lives. Previous studies suggested that involvement could contribute to heightened expectations (Pereira Filho & Moreno Añez, 2021), which supports this finding. Contrary to previous research, the expected negative effect of disconfirmation sensitivity on expectations did not occur in either sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the context of this study, subjective knowledge of food may be viewed as an indicator of involvement, in the sense that both represent how important food is to the consumer. Given knowledgeable consumers' tendency to judge products by higher standards (Alba et al, 1994), and recent research on involvement (Pereira Filho & Moreno Añez, 2021), we hypothesize that subjective knowledge has a positive association with expectations of institutional food. However, we expect the positive effect to be stronger for normative expectations, compared to predictive expectations.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations