Why and How Does Shared Language Affect Subsidiary Knowledge Inflows? A Social Identity Perspective

Abstract

Copyright and moral rights to this thesis/research project are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Any use of the thesis/research project for private study or research must be properly acknowledged with reference to the work's full bibliographic details.This thesis/research project may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from it, or its content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s).If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address:eprints@mdx.ac.ukThe item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated. AbstractExtending existing international business (IB) research, we conceptualize shared social identity as an outcome rather than only an antecedent of multinational enterprise knowledge flows to provide an alternative reason for why such knowledge flows occur. We further argue that shared language among subsidiary and headquarters (HQ) managers is an insufficient condition for subsidiary knowledge receipt. Accordingly, we develop a moderated mediation model at the subsidiary level to examine how shared language affects subsidiaries' tacit knowledge inflows from HQ. Specifically, we study (1) whether this relationship is mediated by the extent to which subsidiary managers share HQ goals and vision, and the extent to which Human Resources decisions are centralized at HQ; and (2) whether subsidiary type (greenfields vs acquisitions) moderates these mediated relationships such that in both cases the mediation will be stronger in foreign acquisitions compared with foreign greenfields. Building on a sample of 817 subsidiaries in 9 countries/regions and a novel subjective measure of shared language, we find support for our model. Implications for research on HQ-subsidiary knowledge flows, social identity theory and the literature on sociolinguistics, and international Human Resource Management are discussed and managerial implications outlined.

Fostering Employee Trust via Effective Supervisory Communication during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Through the Lens of Motivating Language Theory

“…Specifically, first, leaders’ use of meaning-making language emphasizes organizational values and aligns the personal goals of employees with those of the organization. The shared values and purpose may bind employees together and enhance employee connection with the organization, thus satisfying the psychological need for relatedness ( Mayfield & Mayfield, 2018 ; Reiche et al, 2017 ). Second, leaders’ use of empathetic language sends message of empathy, compassion, care, and support ( Mayfield & Mayfield, 2018 ), which makes employees feel they are not alone facing various challenges during the pandemic.…”

Recruitment of local human resources and its effect on foreign subsidiaries in Japan

“…An alternative way to augment subsidiaries’ absorptive capacity might be recruitment, as this study suggests. By recruiting individuals who have professional expertise that subsidiaries demand or lack, subsidiaries can reinforce and strengthen their absorptive capacity, which increases the degree of knowledge base overlap between subsidiaries and the parent firm and promotes knowledge transfer (Barkema and Drogendijk, 2007; Reiche et al , 2015). In addition to recruiting individuals who have higher professional expertise, the results of this study indicated the importance of language and intercultural skills in cross-border settings.…”

“…a subsidiary) have established their knowledge bases separately. These two organizations might have distinct knowledge bases that do not have sufficient overlap (Reiche et al , 2015). To transfer knowledge, they must share a certain level of common ground where knowledge can flow in the post-acquisition stage (Reiche et al , 2015; Sarala and Vaara, 2010).…”

“…These two organizations might have distinct knowledge bases that do not have sufficient overlap (Reiche et al , 2015). To transfer knowledge, they must share a certain level of common ground where knowledge can flow in the post-acquisition stage (Reiche et al , 2015; Sarala and Vaara, 2010). Managers and engineers hired through profession-sensitive recruitment may introduce knowledge that a subsidiary lacks, enhance the subsidiary’s absorptive capacity and create the overlap in the knowledge base between the parent firm and the subsidiary (Barkema and Drogendijk, 2007).…”

Restorative Justice in New Zealand Schools: An Evaluation of Sustainable Practice

“…The discourses used when describing RP show how they become a part of, and therefore a lasting fixture inside schools. Reiche et al (2017) highlight that a shared language can have significant impact on the knowledge uptake inside institutions and therefore the identity of those comparing them.…”