2002
DOI: 10.1177/016344370202400205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whose All Blacks?

Abstract: From about the 1880s, an imagined sense of New Zealand-ness, mass communication, and the game of rugby took shape together. This process was primarily signified by the name, image, and exploits of the All Blacks. This article argues that global media and corporate sponsorship threatens the nationally constituted heritage of All Black rugby. But, the argument in question is not a nostalgic defence of some ‘golden age’. At given points in history, the All Black heritage was ideologically constructed and subjecte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Wayne Hope argues, the imagined sense of New Zealand-ness, mass communication and the game of rugby must be conceptualized 'as a triangulated field of social forces'. 27 Media rebuttal of ongoing challenges to the privileged status of the game have been significant in the consolidation of rugby union as the national sport. Criticism of links with racially exclusive South African rugby, for example, were met by journalistic promotion of rugby as an exemplar of racial tolerance.…”
Section: Globalisation Sport Nationalism and 'Dislocation'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Wayne Hope argues, the imagined sense of New Zealand-ness, mass communication and the game of rugby must be conceptualized 'as a triangulated field of social forces'. 27 Media rebuttal of ongoing challenges to the privileged status of the game have been significant in the consolidation of rugby union as the national sport. Criticism of links with racially exclusive South African rugby, for example, were met by journalistic promotion of rugby as an exemplar of racial tolerance.…”
Section: Globalisation Sport Nationalism and 'Dislocation'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Jameson marks the 1940s as the shift from the "stage of imperialism" to multinational capitalism, for the purposes of this article, the NZRU's shift from imperialistic to multinational administration of the Mäori All Blacks occurred during the mid-1990s. During this time the NZRU underwent a dramatic transformation from an amateur sporting body with ties to national corporations (including Steinlager and Canterbury Ltd.) and the State broadcaster (Television New Zealand), to a corporate-modeled sporting organization with affiliations to major global corporations (including sponsors Adidas, Iveco, and MasterCard) and media conglomerate News Corporation (Hope, 2002). These profound alterations in the structure and organization of rugby in New Zealand mimic Jameson's understandings of historical economic transformation in which a traditional administration driven by an imperial impetus to protect the interests of the local is replaced by an organization focused on profit maximization and the commodification of local culture.…”
Section: The Mäori All Blacks Hyperrace and Whitenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The southern hemisphere rugby season is currently defined by two major international fixtures: the Super 14 (a relatively recent professional rugby competition between provincial teams from New Zealand, Australia, and South Africa), which begins in February and ends in May, and the Tri-Nations international tournament played between national teams from New Zealand, Australia, and South Africa, which typically begins in June and ends in July. Since the creation of this seasonal format in 1996 (see Hope, 2002), the Mäori All Blacks have typically been selected alongside the All Black and the Junior All Black (formerly known as New Zealand A) squads following the conclusion of the Super 14. The coordinated selection enables the NZRU to keep those players who are next in line for All Black honors match-fit and under the scrutiny of All Black selectors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a telling portent, he advocates for a commercial model to be applied to rugby at every turn, including centralized control of commercial gain to avoid "conflict," clarity of expectations on players' commercial responsibilities, and the need to appeal to the demands and desires of sponsors for market expansion of their products (Thomas, 1993). Driven by the marketing imperatives and neoliberal philosophies of these businessmen, the commodification of the game and players who have emerged as junior brand managers have become inseparable from the broader national interests of "the game" (Hope, 2002). Such an approach, however, was not uncontested.…”
Section: Rugby In New Zealand: From National Interest To Private Profmentioning
confidence: 99%