1944
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(44)80177-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whooping cough

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Good results were reported by various workers with doses from 70,000,000,000 to 140,000,000,000 bacilli (Kendrick and Eldering,4 Miller and Faber, 6 Sauer, 6 Lapin, Cohen and Weichsel,7 Silverthorne and Fraser,8 Daughtry-Denmark 9 and others). Good results were reported by various workers with doses from 70,000,000,000 to 140,000,000,000 bacilli (Kendrick and Eldering,4 Miller and Faber, 6 Sauer, 6 Lapin, Cohen and Weichsel,7 Silverthorne and Fraser,8 Daughtry-Denmark 9 and others).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Good results were reported by various workers with doses from 70,000,000,000 to 140,000,000,000 bacilli (Kendrick and Eldering,4 Miller and Faber, 6 Sauer, 6 Lapin, Cohen and Weichsel,7 Silverthorne and Fraser,8 Daughtry-Denmark 9 and others). Good results were reported by various workers with doses from 70,000,000,000 to 140,000,000,000 bacilli (Kendrick and Eldering,4 Miller and Faber, 6 Sauer, 6 Lapin, Cohen and Weichsel,7 Silverthorne and Fraser,8 Daughtry-Denmark 9 and others).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%