1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199605/06)18:3<242::aid-hed6>3.3.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole salivary flow rates following submandibular gland resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
64
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Stimulated and Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rates inUnilateral Submandibular Gland Excision Patients and the Control Group. Unstimulated salivary flow is more important to the general state of oral hygiene than is stimulated flow.1 Patients at risk for caries secondary to decreased salivary flow should use stannous fluoride gel prophylactically 6. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimulated and Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rates inUnilateral Submandibular Gland Excision Patients and the Control Group. Unstimulated salivary flow is more important to the general state of oral hygiene than is stimulated flow.1 Patients at risk for caries secondary to decreased salivary flow should use stannous fluoride gel prophylactically 6. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,[13][14][15][16][17] The level of evidence in the different studies ranged from 2 14,16 to 4. [10][11][12][13]15,17 Missing randomization was found in six of eight studies. Only Roh et al and Min et al performed a randomization of their patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,12 In five of the evaluated articles, there were more than 30 study participants, ranging from 31 to 101 patients. 11,[14][15][16][17] All studies had a prospective design. Two studies included a control group, 11,12 and in the other articles, patients served as their own controls or a comparison group existed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations