2019
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole brain P MRSI at 7T with a dual‐tuned receive array

Abstract: Purpose:The design and performance of a novel head coil setup for 31 P spectroscopy at ultra-high field strengths (7T) is presented. The described system supports measurements at both the 1 H and 31 P resonance frequencies.Methods: The novel coil consists of 2, actively detunable, coaxial birdcage coils to give homogeneous transmit, combined with a double resonant 30 channel receive array. This allows for anatomical imaging combined with 31 P acquisitions over the whole head, without changing coils or disturbi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, other dedicated 31 P coil setups have been demonstrated for 7 T for brain imaging ( 19 , 20 ). These state-of-the-art head coils have indicated more than a factor 3 in SNR performance gain when comparing their array with the typical volume coil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, other dedicated 31 P coil setups have been demonstrated for 7 T for brain imaging ( 19 , 20 ). These state-of-the-art head coils have indicated more than a factor 3 in SNR performance gain when comparing their array with the typical volume coil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way, the 31 P setup could be substantially simplified, avoiding the need for adiabatic RF pulses and thus maintaining SAR guidelines within relatively short scan times. While other 31 P head coils (19,20) have been reported in literature, these were optimised for brain imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional ability to transmit and receive at the higher 1 H frequency is necessary for providing static magnetic field (B 0 ) shimming, spatial localization, and proton decoupling and/or application of polarization techniques in the case of 13 C nuclei. Proton decoupling as well as nuclear Overhauser enhancement can also be beneficial for other X-nuclei such as 31 P. Considering that RF coils require both local transmission and reception at UHF, the designs of DT coils, which often consist of several layers of transmit (Tx) and receive (Rx) resonant elements, [1][2][3][4][5][6] become quite complex. To simplify the DT coil development, usually the major design idea is to preserve high SNR and Tx efficiency (B 1 + /√P, where P is the RF input power) at the X-nucleus frequency, while the performance of the 1 H part of the coil is compromised intentionally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two major options in designing a DT RF coil (or an array), ie double-tuning the same physical coil structure [7][8][9] (or each element of the array 1,6 ) to two different frequencies simultaneously or arranging two separate ST coils (or coil arrays) resonating at different frequencies close to each other. 1,[3][4][5]10 The first method allows optimization of the coil mainly at one frequency (commonly X-nuclei) while the Tx performance and SNR at the other frequency (commonly 1 H) is degraded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, designing a switch matrix suitable for operation with protons and the most common X-nuclei at high-field is desirable. It would, for example, enable the combined operation of a CP mode proton coil with a 32-channel sodium array in a system equipped with 32 receive channels or the connection of more advanced double-tuned arrays as described in [ 38 ]. Note, that switch matrix implementations operating at the proton frequency as well as at one or more X-nucleus frequency has been previously described in [ 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%