2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2015.7138995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-body multi-modal semi-autonomous teleoperation of mobile manipulator systems

Abstract: We propose a novel whole-body multi-modal semiautonomous teleoperation framework for mobile manipulator systems, which consists of: 1) Motion capture and wholebody motion mapping to allow the operator to intuitively teleoperate the mobile manipulator without being constrained by the master interface while also fully exploiting whole-body dexterity; 2) Slave robot autonomous control to allow the mobile manipulator to optimally track the operator's whole-body command, while taking into account the user-slave kin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, a master/puppet system is useful for creating an intuitive mapping between the local, master device and the remote puppet one (Glover et al, 2009;Park et al, 2021), although if there are any differences between the kinematics of the master and the puppet, a control scheme must be invented to translate between the two (Rebelo and Schiele, 2012). The final method, with the human-as-the-master, is similar to the master/puppet system but uses the human operator's own body as the master device, tracking its movement via cameras, datagloves, or IMUs (Ha et al, 2015;Jang et al, 2019). In this case, control schemes must be invented to translate the operator's motion into the joint space of the robot (Speeter, 1992;Rakita et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a master/puppet system is useful for creating an intuitive mapping between the local, master device and the remote puppet one (Glover et al, 2009;Park et al, 2021), although if there are any differences between the kinematics of the master and the puppet, a control scheme must be invented to translate between the two (Rebelo and Schiele, 2012). The final method, with the human-as-the-master, is similar to the master/puppet system but uses the human operator's own body as the master device, tracking its movement via cameras, datagloves, or IMUs (Ha et al, 2015;Jang et al, 2019). In this case, control schemes must be invented to translate the operator's motion into the joint space of the robot (Speeter, 1992;Rakita et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While using several camera perspectives may appear to be a solution, it results in an increment influx of information for the operator. The continuous processing and screening for helpful information in many video feeds places a cognitive burden on the user, resulting in inefficiencies and a reliance on user experience and technique [15] [16]. Constructing a 3D model of the robot within a virtual environment has the capability to increase user comprehension of the robot's status with a strong emphasis on depth perception [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%