Who wins the race for knowledge-based competitiveness? Comparing European and North American FDI patterns

Abstract

The geographical dispersion of value-added activities triggered by the ‘great unbundling’ of production has made the race for competitiveness increasingly shaped by the capability of multinational corporations (MNCs) to orchestrate global innovation networks at world scale. However, major differences in the distribution of foreign investments across value chain functions undertaken by MNCs based in different economic areas have drawn little attention in the empirical literature. This work attempts to fill this gap by focusing on the FDI patterns of European and North American MNCs, which have historically played a key role in the internationalization of production and innovation. To this aim, we compare outward FDI flows of European and North American MNCs in manufacturing and knowledge-intensive activities over the period 2003–2017. We show that while European MNCs are key players in global networks of production, they do not reach the heights of North American investors in the dispersion of knowledge-based activities. Most importantly, European MNCs rely on emerging economies more to offshore production than to set up R&D labs in these countries; by contrast, US-based MNCs are more prone to engage in knowledge-intensive FDIs towards the most dynamic emerging countries (especially China and India, as well as the Four Asian Tigers). Further, we account for the growing role of new entrants in global FDI markets by comparing the advanced economies’ foreign investment decisions with those from Chinese MNCs. Drawing from the literature on the globalization of R&D and cross-border knowledge transmission, a discussion is finally offered on the potential implications of the detected differences in internationalization patterns, together with possible directions for future research.

The virtues and limits of specialization in global value chains: analysis and policy implications

“…Cross-border trade and capital flows are largely affected by the strategic offshoring decisions of multinational corporations (MNCs) committed to specialize in their core competencies while moving other value adding activities to other locations where the latter can be carried out at a lower cost or more effectively (Buckley et al, 2020 ; Coveri & Zanfei, 2022a ). Symmetrically, low- and middle-income countries have been provided with the opportunity to promote exports and foster their industrialization pace by joining international supply chains without the imperative to build-up new industries from scratch (Cattaneo et al, 2010 ; Taglioni & Winkler, 2016 ).…”

The impact of foreign R&D on the innovation performance of China’s high-tech industry and its spatial spillover effect

“…Foreign R&D network has become a core part of the high-quality development of China's national innovation ecology [23]. Compared with European TNCs that rely on emerging economies for offshore production, TNCs based in the United States are more willing to make knowlege-intensive foreign direct investments in emerging countries such as China and once [24]. The new growth theory believes that the driving force of economic growth comes from imitation and innovation, highlighting the critical role of factors such as R&D and externalities in innovation and high-quality economic development [25,26].…”

Strategic Planning Software As A Tool For Improvement Of Business Information Space

“…Current management approaches are innovative in that they turn to a knowledge-based form of business organization (Coveri & Zanfei, 2022;Werr & Stjernberg, 2003). The highest form of business organization -the knowledge type -is aimed at developing a knowledge base that provides key business competences.…”