Who Owns the World's Media?

Noam, Eli M.; Collaboration, The International Media Concentration

doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199987238.001.0001

Cited by 100 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Por ejemplo, los ingresos de taquilla de las seis grandes distribuidoras de Hollywood suponen sólo un 2,09% del total de las industrias de contenidos. Si se suman otros ingresos aparte de las salas, llegarían a un 7,75% (Noam, 2016(Noam, , pp. 1261(Noam, -1264.…”

Section: Artero Flynn Yunclassified

“…En la mayor parte de los países los ingresos de telecomunicaciones son el doble que los de los medios de contenidos, que suelen representar el 29,3% del volumen de negocio y en ningún país más de la mitad. Las 12 mayores compañías del mundo son proveedores de telecomunicaciones, tres de las cuales además también poseen contenidos entre sus activos (Noam, 2016(Noam, , pp. 1266(Noam, -1267.…”

Section: Artero Flynn Yunclassified

“…Los países con una mayor concentración de medios informativos en concreto según los ingresos en 2011 eran China (con un IHH de 7.661 puntos) Egipto (4.199) México (4.266) Italia (3.878) y Rusia (3.853) con una media mundial de 2.818, ligeramente reducida desde 2004. Pocos países están bajo el límite de alta concentración de los 1.800 puntos, entre ellos España, que pasó de 1.678 en 2004 a 1.409 en 2011 (Noam, 2016(Noam, , p. 1271. La concentración de medios ponderada por las cuotas de atención informativa es muy alta en la mayoría de países, mayor que la calculada por ingresos.…”

Section: Artero Flynn Yunclassified

“…Para el autor de nuevo la lógica es la de las economías de escala. Además de eso, los grandes productores también se benefician de los efectos de red positivos, ya que los usuarios obtienen utilidad de la presencia de otros usuarios (Noam, 2016(Noam, , p. 1248.…”

unclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Competencia, pluralismo y diversidad: integración en un modelo de pluralidad mediática

Muñoz

2020

Comunicación Y Diversidad. Selección De Comunicaciones Del VII Congreso Internacional De La Asociación Española De Investigació

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research reviews relevant definitions, causes, and results on competition, pluralism, and diversity as concepts applied to the media industry, which have tended to be studied in a parallel but isolated way. A Media Plurality Model is thus proposed to integrate the mentioned notions and be applied at four levels of analysis: environments, competitors, contents, and audiences. The notion of media plurality is not intended to substitute competition, pluralism, and diversity but rather to integrate them and give them more precise meaning. Consequently, it is understood that their basic domains are economic, institutional, and cultural, respectively. Resumen Esta investigación revisa las definiciones, causas y resultados relevantes sobre la competencia, el pluralismo y la diversidad como conceptos aplicados a la industria de la comunicación. Han tendido a ser estudiados de una manera paralela, pero aislada. Por ello, se propone un Modelo de Pluralidad Mediática, que integra las nociones anteriores y que se aplica en cuatro niveles de análisis: entornos, competidores, contenidos y audiencias. La noción de pluralidad mediática no pretende sustituir a las de competencia, pluralismo y diversidad, sino integrarlas y dotarlas de un significado más preciso. Se entiende, por tanto, que sus dominios básicos son respectivamente el económico, el institucional y el cultural.

show abstract

Section: Artero Flynn Yunclassified

unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Competencia, pluralismo y diversidad: integración en un modelo de pluralidad mediática

Muñoz

2020

Comunicación Y Diversidad. Selección De Comunicaciones Del VII Congreso Internacional De La Asociación Española De Investigació

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Outside the merger review process, the FCC has conducted a series of studies that have consistently shown, for nearly a decade, that concentration levels in mobile wireless and broadband access markets are "astonishingly high," as Eli Noam (2016) observes (see pp. 25, 1307-1316).…”

Section: Mergers and Acquisitionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Curious Tale of Economics and Common Carriage (Net Neutrality) at the FCC: A Reply to Faulhaber, Singer, and Urschel

Pooley¹,

Winseck²

2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This reply to “The Curious Absence of Economic Analysis at the Federal Communications Commission” by Faulhaber, Singer, and Urschel makes three claims. First, we document the paper’s undisclosed origins as a white paper commissioned by an advocacy group with deep ties to the telecommunications industry. Second, we describe two of the authors’ active participation, on behalf of clients, in a range of contested issues before the FCC in recent years. Finally, our review of FCC workshops, roundtables, seminars, dockets, and rulings—including during its landmark 2015 Open Internet Order and several blockbuster mergers and acquisitions—provides detailed evidence to refute the paper’s core “curious absence” charge. The stakes could not be higher, we conclude, as the new FCC chair, Ajit Pai, has repeatedly referenced the paper to justify his rollback of FCC regulations—including, crucially, the common carriage/net neutrality rules so vigorously opposed by the paper’s funders.

show abstract

Political Economy

Newman¹

2019

The International Encyclopedia of Media Literacy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Political economy is the interdisciplinary study of the relations that concern the distribution of resources and the reproduction of systems of production, extending to life and culture itself. It is a macrolevel analysis, paying close attention to the politics and policies (explicit and implicit) that undergird market structures and other structures of power—a view of the totality of social relations and social change—as well as their historical development. Various streams incorporate elements of sociology, economics, political science, law, and media and cultural studies in their analyses. It sometimes serves both as a field and a method, one focused on social transformation; by the same token, what distinguishes approaches to the field and the strategies of individual analysts tends to fall along lines of the importance of historical analysis, the way markets and individuals are theorized, and the centrality of democratic theory to a variant's constitution.

show abstract

Who Owns the World's Media?

Cited by 100 publications

References 0 publications

Competencia, pluralismo y diversidad: integración en un modelo de pluralidad mediática

Competencia, pluralismo y diversidad: integración en un modelo de pluralidad mediática

A Curious Tale of Economics and Common Carriage (Net Neutrality) at the FCC: A Reply to Faulhaber, Singer, and Urschel

Political Economy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About