2000
DOI: 10.2307/1061611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who Minimum Wage Increases Bite: An Analysis Using Monthly Data from the SIPP and the CPS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 10 percent increase in the minimum wage is associated with an 8.8 percent reduction in employment for single mothers who had not completed high school. This estimated employment elasticity is quite large compared to elasticities found in the literature on teenagers, which tend to range from Ϫ0.1 to Ϫ0.3 (Neumark & Wascher, 2007), but is comparable to estimates obtained for non-high school graduates, which recent studies have placed between Ϫ0.8 and Ϫ0.9 (Burkhauser, Couch, & Wittenburg, 2000a, 2000bNeumark, 2007).…”
Section: Employment Hours and Income Effectssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A 10 percent increase in the minimum wage is associated with an 8.8 percent reduction in employment for single mothers who had not completed high school. This estimated employment elasticity is quite large compared to elasticities found in the literature on teenagers, which tend to range from Ϫ0.1 to Ϫ0.3 (Neumark & Wascher, 2007), but is comparable to estimates obtained for non-high school graduates, which recent studies have placed between Ϫ0.8 and Ϫ0.9 (Burkhauser, Couch, & Wittenburg, 2000a, 2000bNeumark, 2007).…”
Section: Employment Hours and Income Effectssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Several studies directly case of greater effort, optimal selection of such counterbalancing factors is already available to employers through voluntarily raising wages, and thus, mandated minimum wages can be expected to raise unit labor costs overall, which must be paid for by some sourceðsÞ. critique the approaches used to derive the "new" conclusions ðe.g., Deere, Murphy, and Welch 1995;Kim and Taylor 1995;Welch 1995;Burkhauser, Couch, and Wittenburg 2000;Neumark and Wascher 2000Þ. Others studies confirm the consensus view of the 1980s and find negative employment effects primarily concentrated among younger workers ðe.g., Currie and Fallick 1996;Neumark 2001;Williams and Mills 2001;Neumark and Wascher 2002;Neumark, Schweitzer, and Wascher 2004Þ.…”
Section: A Reducing Employmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…First, because of their potential to be affected by minimum wage hikes, non-teenage less-educated individuals have increasingly drawn attention from researchers. For instance, Sabia (2008) explores the effect of minimum wage increases on less-educated single mothers in their prime-age working years, and Burkhauser, Couch, andWittenburg (2000a, 2000b) examine less-educated individuals in their twenties. Second, as Neumark and Wascher note, older low-wage workers may be of more policy relevance:…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%