1971
DOI: 10.1002/j.2164-4918.1971.tb03721.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who killed George Washington?

Abstract: The issue of standards for professional practice ranks high among the ethical, moral, and legal concerns of guidance and counseling. We are troubled not only about what these standards shall be but also about the problem of deciding by whom and in what manner they are to be developed and enforced. This article presents one perspective on the dilemma, and suggests steps that might lead to its partial resolution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1972
1972

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As one reviews the professional literature dealing with the counseling of minorities and ads the charges leveled against counselors It becomes clear that what most minority 35 group clients are angry about is guidance malpractice. Beymer (1971) suggests the time has come when we will see a malpractice suit brought against a counselor. The distinctions between counseling and guidance are more than academic and have significant implications for the counselor who works with minority groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one reviews the professional literature dealing with the counseling of minorities and ads the charges leveled against counselors It becomes clear that what most minority 35 group clients are angry about is guidance malpractice. Beymer (1971) suggests the time has come when we will see a malpractice suit brought against a counselor. The distinctions between counseling and guidance are more than academic and have significant implications for the counselor who works with minority groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%