Who is in control? Clinicians’ view on their role in self-management approaches: a qualitative metasynthesis

Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore clinician perceptions of involvement in delivery of self-management approaches.SettingAll healthcare settings.DesignEBSCO, Scopus and AMED databases were searched, in July 2013, for peer-reviewed studies in English reporting original qualitative data concerning perceptions of clinicians regarding their involvement in or integration of a self-management approach. Of 1930 studies identified, 1889 did not meet the inclusion criteria. Full text of 41 studies were reviewed by two independent reviewers; 14 papers were included for metasynthesis. Findings and discussion sections were imported into Nvivo-10 and coded line-by-line. Codes were organised into descriptive themes and cross-checked against original sources to check interpretation, and refined iteratively until findings represented an agreed understanding. Studies were appraised for quality.ResultsDelivering self-management in practice appeared to be a complex process for many clinicians. The issue of ‘control’ arose in all studies, both in the qualitative data and authors’ interpretations. The first theme: Who is in control?—represented ways clinicians talked of exercising control over patients and the control they expected patients to have over their condition. The second theme: Changing clinician views—reflected what appeared to be an essential transformation of practice experienced by some clinicians in the process of integrating self-management approaches into the practice. A range of challenges associated with shifting towards a self-management approach were reflected in the third theme, Overcoming challenges to change. Tensions appeared to exist around forming partnerships with patients. Strategies found helpful in the process of change included: dedicating time to practice reciprocity in communication style, peer support and self-reflection.ConclusionsA consistent finding across studies is that ‘control’ is a key feature of how self-management is viewed by clinicians. They described challenges associated with the paradigm shift required to share or let go of control. Future research should identify whether strategies described by clinicians are key to successful self-management.

Building Bridges between healthcare professionals, patients and families: A coproduced and integrated approach to self-management support in stroke

“…Emerging research has shown that healthcare professionals can have very different understandings of self-management support (Mudge, Kayes, & McPherson, 2016;van Hooft, Dwarswaard, Jedeloo, Bal, & van Staa, 2015;Young et al, 2015). This supports our view and that of others that it is imperative to train whole teams, preferably using methods to facilitate interprofessional discussion and exchange (Reeves, Perrier, Goldman, Freeth, & Zwarenstein, 2013).…”

How is rehabilitation with and without an integrated self-management approach perceived by UK community-dwelling stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation to explore implementation and contextual variations

“…As some authors have noted if decision-making is made primarily by healthcare professionals, this can restrict individuals from developing personal control and autonomy. [7][8][9][10] While most rehabilitation purports to be patient centred, the level of collaboration in processes such as goal setting can be inconsistent. 10 In addition, selfmanagement support interventions designed specifically for patients with stroke are relatively rare.…”

Is diabetes self-management education still the Cinderella of diabetes care?

“…Part of this tension may be associated with the complexity of balancing protective aspects of care (e.g. ensuring patients avoid harmful consequences) with elements of patient choice and responsibility (22). This links to the clinicians' tendency towards self-blame, assuming responsibility when their diabetes patients do not achieve targets (23).…”