How is rehabilitation with and without an integrated self-management approach perceived by UK community-dwelling stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation to explore implementation and contextual variations

Abstract

ObjectiveSelf-management programmes could support long-term needs after stroke and using methods integrated into rehabilitation is one option. To explore theoretical assumptions and possible mechanisms of implementation a process evaluation was delivered alongside a cluster trial which has demonstrated feasibility of an integrated self-management programme (Bridges SMP) in community-dwelling stroke survivors. This paper aims to show the extent to which experiences from stroke survivors receiving rehabilitation in control (usual care) and intervention (integrated self-management) sites reflected the differences in rehabilitation received and whether their understandings aligned with the self-management approach employed.DesignSemistructured qualitative interviews carried out as part of a process evaluation analysed thematically.SettingStudy was based in South London; all interviews were carried out in participants' home setting.Participants22 stroke participants recruited; 12 from integrated self-management sites and 10 from usual care sites.ResultsAll participants revealed shared appreciation of knowledge and support from therapists but subtle differences emerged between sites in respect to perceptions about responsibility, control and how previous experiences were used. Accounts depicted a variance regarding who had structured and planned their rehabilitation, with greater flexibility about content and involvement perceived by participants from the integrated self-management sites. They also provided accounts and experiences which aligned with principles of the intervention, such as self-discovery and problem-solving.ConclusionsThe findings reflect our theoretical assumptions and possible mechanisms of implementation that rehabilitation with a focus on supporting self-management is reflected in accounts and understandings of stroke survivors. Taken together with our previous research this justifies evaluating the effectiveness of Bridges SMP in a larger sample to further contribute to an understanding of the functioning of the intervention, implementation, contextual factors and mechanisms of impact.Trial registration numberISRCTN42534180; Post-results.

How do stroke survivors with communication difficulties manage life after stroke in the first year? A qualitative study

“…Given the complexity of difficulties faced post‐stroke and in particular, the complexity of post‐stroke communication difficulties there may be no ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ way for stroke survivors with communication difficulties to manage life after stroke (Jones et al . ). However, support during the process of developing strategies, and ways of managing which are specific to the particular context of the stroke survivor with communication difficulties and their family, may be crucial for building feelings of confidence in ability to manage in the longer term.…”

Supporting self‐management after traumatic brain injury: Codesign and evaluation of a new intervention across a trauma pathway

“…Self‐management approaches to increase self‐efficacy incorporate goal mastery, learning from the experience of others in a similar situation, psychological or physical feedback, and social persuasion. The established intervention follows seven principles of problem‐solving, reflection, goal setting, accessing resources, self‐discovery, activity and knowledge . Implementation of this self‐management support is through existing health‐care interactions that are tailored to patients' needs and is achieved through an interdisciplinary approach.…”

“…The established intervention follows seven principles of problem-solving, reflection, goal setting, accessing resources, self-discovery, activity and knowledge. 28 Implementation of this self-management support is through existing health-care interactions that are tailored to patients' needs and is achieved through an interdisciplinary approach. We sought to contextualize this existing model to challenges encountered after TBI, through collaboration with patients, family members and service providers.…”

Fall prevention in primary care using chronic disease management plans: A process evaluation of provider and consumer perspectives

“…These evaluations are essential to better understand how interventions can be integrated into practice in the future. For this pilot study, it was important to evaluate whether health professionals viewed the intervention as a short-term add-on activity or not, and to establish how older participants accepted and adopted the intervention (Jones, McKevitt, Riazi, & Liston, 2017). For this pilot study, it was important to evaluate whether health professionals viewed the intervention as a short-term add-on activity or not, and to establish how older participants accepted and adopted the intervention (Jones, McKevitt, Riazi, & Liston, 2017).…”

“…Process evaluations can provide valuable insights about why interventions are successful or not, why they are adopted into practice or not and to assist with future intervention strategies (Suman, Schaafsma, Buchbinder, van Tulder & Anema, 2017). For this pilot study, it was important to evaluate whether health professionals viewed the intervention as a short-term add-on activity or not, and to establish how older participants accepted and adopted the intervention (Jones, McKevitt, Riazi, & Liston, 2017). According to one published framework for conducting process evaluations, post-intervention evaluations are usually focussed on the response of individuals to the intervention, and the sustainability and any unintended consequences of the intervention (Grant et al, 2017).…”