Who governs? Power in the local Russian community

Abstract

This article presents the outcomes of a research project conducted in two small towns in the Perm region. The study of power in the two communities focused on two major themes: (1) the composition of influential actors and institutions and the power hierarchy; (2) relationships between them and coalition building. The discovered configuration of actors and relationships between them demonstrate, on the one hand, quite a lot in common with European and North American communities, on the other hand, a number of features that reflect the systemic and institutional properties of Russian politics and society. The social base of the local power structure is very narrow. The local elite composed of the heads of the executive, business leaders, and the most influential representatives of urban and district legislatures actually holds all the power in the local community, having no serious opponents or a real alternative in the foreseeable future. This power structure is supported by informal institutions and personal relationships within the elite and between the elite and those who are forced to accept the existing system of relations; it allows them to successfully protect their personal and/or corporate interests. A wide range of opportunities to use official position and/or relationships with public officials for personal enrichment stimulates the formation of various kinds of coalitions for the furtherment of the personal interests of its members.

The politics of poverty in contemporary Russia

“…16 See Table 3.1. 17 The exact title varies from region to region (see Ledyaev et al 2014). 18 Hence, the oil-rich regions had to bear the losses due to the reduced incomes from oil, but the other regions were not as clearly affected, because they continued to benefit from transfers.…”

Exploring the Role of Duma in the Power Structure of Contemporary Russia

“…Furthermore, the local Duma has played a solid role in consolidating local authoritarian power structures. For instance, in Kungur, the mayor has traditionally chosen the majority of the Duma's members, giving him or her a "controlling stake", and through the Duma, the mayor can pass laws through them, increasing legitimacy and reducing controversy over his rule [4]. This means that the Duma also plays a consolidating role in their power structures in local communities.…”

The octopus-like power of Pesantren dynasty in the dynamics of local politics

“…Traditional power held by local elites is limited territorially, so that the more prominent power the local elites have, the more significant it is (Ledyaev et al, 2014). The significant political power and spaces convergence with the local and global.…”