2007
DOI: 10.1086/518492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who (Else) Is the Teacher? Cautionary Notes on Teacher Accountability Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most school accountability research has focused on teachers' role in school accountability-delivering programs, collecting student data, interpreting standardized test results to improve instructional practices, and being evaluated themselves through teacher appraisal processes (Wiliam 2010;Christophersen et al 2010;Valli et al 2007;Lauen 2013). Scholars have also concentrated on student accountability (Harris and Herrington 2006), school accountability (Hanushek and Raymond 2005), and school district accountability (Campbell and Levin 2009;Firestone and Shipps 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most school accountability research has focused on teachers' role in school accountability-delivering programs, collecting student data, interpreting standardized test results to improve instructional practices, and being evaluated themselves through teacher appraisal processes (Wiliam 2010;Christophersen et al 2010;Valli et al 2007;Lauen 2013). Scholars have also concentrated on student accountability (Harris and Herrington 2006), school accountability (Hanushek and Raymond 2005), and school district accountability (Campbell and Levin 2009;Firestone and Shipps 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marginalization occurs not only within the school, but is also embedded within the discourse of public policy documents, such as 'No Child Left Behind' (US Department of Education, 2002) in the USA, which cast PE as less important than other school subjects. Conceptualizing PE as peripheral to the central mission of schooling may shield PE teachers from some of the stress associated with standardized testing and teacher accountability programmes (Valli et al, 2007). However, these policies are also likely to have negative implications for the work of PE teachers that need to be explored more completely in future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we watched students and adults move in and out of classrooms, we began to categorize the different ways in which multiple adults shared responsibility for teaching reading (Valli et al, 2007). We first divided these patterns broadly into two categories: unintentional and intentional shared instructional designs.…”
Section: Unintentional Shared Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we suspect that determining the sources of reading instruction has become increasingly difficult in the current highstakes accountability environment, where teachers and principals look for ways to meet accelerating expectations for student achievement. The main reasons given by principals for using these more complex instructional designs were to provide extra support to both students and teachers, particularly in classes where numerous students were below grade level in reading, and to maximize the distribution of the staff 's reading expertise in ways that would improve student test scores (Valli et al, 2007). As a result, in an era of high-stakes accountability, we should anticipate more rather than less sharing of responsibility for teaching in tested subject areas.…”
Section: Sequential Shared Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation