2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2780-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whither peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumors: an Einsteinian view of the facts and myths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical value of PRRT in patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumors has been reported in several publications [1,2,4,9]. However, many issues remain to be solved in order to improve and personalize the therapy [25]. There is a general agreement in the literature on the importance of individualized therapy using dosimetry as a tool to achieve an individual risk-assessment for sensitive organs [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical value of PRRT in patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumors has been reported in several publications [1,2,4,9]. However, many issues remain to be solved in order to improve and personalize the therapy [25]. There is a general agreement in the literature on the importance of individualized therapy using dosimetry as a tool to achieve an individual risk-assessment for sensitive organs [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of publications during recent years has reported on the clinical value of radionuclide therapy directed towards somatostatin receptors for therapy of patients with neuroendocrine tumours [ 3 , 4 , 6 , 13 ]. Still, many issues remain to be solved in order to improve and personalize the therapy [ 26 ]. In the literature, a general agreement on the importance of individualized therapy is noted, where dosimetry is one tool to achieve an individual risk-assessment for sensitive organs [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there was no difference in overall survival (OS) between patient groups undergoing PRRT with 90 Y and 177 Lu [6], the advantage of using 90 Y for larger tumours and 177 Lu for smaller tumours was suggested, based on animal models [7]. PRRT is generally well tolerated with a major concern for nephrotoxicity and haematotoxicity [8]. However, the risk of nephrotoxicity or haematotoxicity is less with 177 Lu-labelled PRRT [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%