2007
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-1912.2007.tb00060.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

White Middle‐Class Privilege: Social Class Bias and Implications for Training and Practice

Abstract: social class, classism, and privilege and their relationship to counseling have been given insufficient attention. this article defines and explores White middle-class privilege; it proffers support for its integration in a multicultural competency, as well as its intersection with race and other dimensions of multiculturalism and privilege. implications for counseling practice plus a clinical case study illustrate the issues. la clase social, el clasismo y el privilegio, así como su relación con la consejería… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guidance professionals were then called upon to provide 'double duty' -addressing students' personal and emotional well-being alongside their discernment of future possibilities. Importantly, professional norms within guidance counseling have been described as proliferating white privilege (Liu, Pickett, & Ivey, 2007), centering practices and modes of relating that heavily attribute authority and wisdom solely to adults with training and credentials. Conversely, counseling is most effective among students of color and those in low-income communities when it is one spoke in a wheel that includes robust community and family partnerships and recognizes multiple sources of knowledge and insight (Bryan & Henry, 2008).…”
Section: Juncture 1: the Guidance Counseling Momentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guidance professionals were then called upon to provide 'double duty' -addressing students' personal and emotional well-being alongside their discernment of future possibilities. Importantly, professional norms within guidance counseling have been described as proliferating white privilege (Liu, Pickett, & Ivey, 2007), centering practices and modes of relating that heavily attribute authority and wisdom solely to adults with training and credentials. Conversely, counseling is most effective among students of color and those in low-income communities when it is one spoke in a wheel that includes robust community and family partnerships and recognizes multiple sources of knowledge and insight (Bryan & Henry, 2008).…”
Section: Juncture 1: the Guidance Counseling Momentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By allowing ample time for this storytelling to occur, therapists can help clients make sense of their experiences while incorporating new meanings that might include an understanding of systemic contributions to their life difficulties. A systemic view of social class can indirectly provide a path to construct different meanings about one’s socialized self, including aspirations and losses that may be linked to an upward mobility bias (Liu et al, 2007). …”
Section: Working With Low-income Clients: Explicit and Ongoing Attentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include their assumptions of what constitutes ‘good therapy,’ as well as both negative stereotypes and idealizations of people who are poor, which can result in differential and inadequate treatment (Liu et al, 2007). L.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of clinical implications, given that many factors can influence the therapeutic relationship (e.g., race and sexual orientation; Chang & Berk 2009; Mohr, Weiner, Chopp, & Wong, 2009; Townes, Chavez-Korell, & Cunningham, 2009), psychologists should remain mindful of the possible influence that social-class statuses can have within the therapeutic relationship (Liu, Pickett, & Ivey, 2007), how issues of acculturation may interact with notions of masculinity (Neblett, Hammond, Seaton, & Townsend, 2010; Obasi & Leong, 2009), and how best to frame therapeutic interventions (McKelley & Rochlen, 2010; Steinfeldt, Steinfeldt, England, & Speight, 2009; Wester, Arndt, Sedivy, & Arndt, 2010). For instance, is advice giving more effective for low income versus high-income clients (Liu et al, 2004)?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%