2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which cultural group I love depends on how I feel about my identities: The moderating effect of blendedness on the priming of cultural in-group love in undergraduate Asian-American biculturals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, since different media usages have different effects on users due to culture differences [33], [34], which also relates to their social identity and perception of in-group/out-group members [35], it is necessary to conduct comparative studies to include these points in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, since different media usages have different effects on users due to culture differences [33], [34], which also relates to their social identity and perception of in-group/out-group members [35], it is necessary to conduct comparative studies to include these points in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, a clear picture has yet to emerge due to conflicting findings. For instance, Benet-Martínez and Haritatos (2005) and Wiley (2013) showed a positive correlation between identity blendedness and mainstream identification, but no correlation between identity blendedness and heritage identification, whereas Chiou (2016) and Miramontez, Benet-Martínez, and Nguyen (2008) found positive correlations between all three variables. Given these shortcomings, we assert that it is time for research that considers tridimensional identification (i.e., identification with mainstream, heritage, and hybrid cultures) in its own right, not solely through the lens of identity integration.…”
Section: Distinct and Hybrid Cultural Identificationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, the EICM framework enhances understanding of the developmental antecedents of the components of identity integration, or BII. Although there is much research on BII as a moderator (e.g., Chiou, 2016) or independent variable (e.g., Mok & Morris, 2010) in sociocognitive processes and outcomes, there is considerably less evidence on what causes one to develop higher or lower BII in the blendedness or harmony components (Cheng et al, 2014). The present research suggests that EICM is an important antecedent to identity blendedness but is not a reliable predictor of identity harmony, which adds to the growing evidence that the antecedents of identity blendedness differ from those of identity harmony (Huynh et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Исследователи давно пришли к выводу, что эффективность поведения в ситуациях межкультурного взаимодействия, помимо других причин, определяется также личностными особенностями [Leung et al, 2014;Matsumoto, Hwang, 2013;Van der Zee, Van Oudenhoven, 2014;Wilson et al, 2013;Солдатова, Чигарькова, 2016]. Большинство эмпирических исследований в этой области посвящено исследованию личностных черт и их связи с феноменами межкультурного взаимодействия и межкультурной компетентностью, также совсем недавно стали появляться исследования, в которых изучается связь этнической идентичности с успешностью межкультурного взаимодействия [Carmona, 2016;Chiou, 2016;Peng, 2014;Ward, Searle, 1991;Young et al, 2017].…”
Section: этническая идентичность толерантность и культурный интеллект...unclassified