2017
DOI: 10.18178/ijch.2017.3.2.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between International Students’ Social Skills, Social Support Networks and Adaptation in Japan

Abstract: Abstract-Previous IndexTerms-International students in Japan, communication media, social support networks, maladaptation, panel survey.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The top three nationalities were Chinese (including students from Hong Kong), Indonesian and South Korean, which was also similar to national survey results. The average length of stay in Japan was 26 months; the average length of Japanese language study was 39 months, which was also similar to previous studies, including [9]. Over one third of the respondents had passed the Japanese Language Proficiency Test (JLPT) Level 1, indicating that this group had a high level of Japanese language proficiency.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The top three nationalities were Chinese (including students from Hong Kong), Indonesian and South Korean, which was also similar to national survey results. The average length of stay in Japan was 26 months; the average length of Japanese language study was 39 months, which was also similar to previous studies, including [9]. Over one third of the respondents had passed the Japanese Language Proficiency Test (JLPT) Level 1, indicating that this group had a high level of Japanese language proficiency.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Ten items were used to measure social skills. Two items were used to measure attitude (level of liking) toward general Japanese students (JSs) [9]. Ten additional items measured self-esteem [15] (Table II) and six items measured generalized trust [16] (Table III).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%