2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1368980016002512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whetting disadvantaged adults’ appetite for nutrition education

Abstract: Incorporating aspects of most importance to participants into nutrition education programme delivery and promotion may increase joining rates, enjoyment, satisfaction with course content and, ultimately, the uptake of recommended behaviours.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, multivariate analysis has identified a subgroup of participants who will benefit most from a food literacy program. Although government targets indicate that low income and disadvantaged groups are often the focus for these programs [49,50], among the participants in this study, socio-economic disadvantage was not independently associated with the lowest food-literacy behaviours. These findings suggest that food literacy programs must focus on recruiting those with low self-rated cooking skills, who consider healthy foods expensive and have poor dietary intakes (i.e., are less likely to eat recommended serves of fruits and vegetables and have high takeaway and sugary drink consumption).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In addition, multivariate analysis has identified a subgroup of participants who will benefit most from a food literacy program. Although government targets indicate that low income and disadvantaged groups are often the focus for these programs [49,50], among the participants in this study, socio-economic disadvantage was not independently associated with the lowest food-literacy behaviours. These findings suggest that food literacy programs must focus on recruiting those with low self-rated cooking skills, who consider healthy foods expensive and have poor dietary intakes (i.e., are less likely to eat recommended serves of fruits and vegetables and have high takeaway and sugary drink consumption).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The 2011-2014 Food Cent$ Project evaluation found that 12% of the total intervention sample completed a follow-up evaluation six weeks after the project's completion; however, interpreting the results is difficult because the intervention delivery varied in length from one to eight sessions. Nevertheless, improvements in knowledge and fruit consumption in low socio-economic participants were found at follow-up [9]. The results from the earlier 1992 Food Cent$ Project demonstrated a self-reported reduction in discretionary food intake by 36% of attendees who completed the six-week follow-up [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Despite best practice recommendations and evaluation challenges, food literacy programs generally do not report on outcomes or include follow-up evaluations [7]. Programs that use food literacy strategies that do investigate long-term outcomes vary in their follow-up period between one to six months [7][8][9][10][11][12]; however, time frames have also been as short as one week [13] and as long as two years [14]. Programs conducted in 'real world' community settings do not generally attain high follow-up response rates [2] due to the voluntary nature of participation and the frequently low English literacy of attendees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Como citado, as percepções também são influenciadas pela informação e conhecimento, deste modo, averiguou-se nos achados a apropriação desses pelos participantes, em dois aspectos: a relação da informação de alimentação adequada e saudável abordada nos grupos educativos e a produção de conhecimento feita por eles a partir de seus pensamentos e contextos, desencadeada pelas possibilidades de construções emergidas nos grupos (FREIRE, 2011). Esses achados condizem com a avaliação realizada em um estudo sobre EAN em grupo (PETTIGREW et al, 2016), onde os usuários apontaram que as informações teóricas e práticas obtidas ajudaram-nos na decisão da aquisição e do preparo dos alimentos.…”
Section: Acolhimento Dos Participantes E Suas Característicasunclassified