Where design competitions matter: Architectural artefacts and discursive events

Abstract

Recent ethnographies among professional architects have given us a novel version of the argument against architectural autonomy: architects work in a condition of entanglement not only with clients and markets, but also with the very objects through which architectural conception takes place. There is a tension between this view and one that surfaces within management scholarship on design competitions. In these studies, the design competition is a moment of architectural work in which architectural autonomy is uniquely pronounced, where the artistic statements of architects achieve a special efficacy. The author investigates the possibility that the design competition enacts a different sort of architectural entanglement than what we see in recent anthropologies. He considers two situations of architects working on design competitions, one in an architectural school in the UK and one at the Office for Metropolitan Architecture. He concludes that, in design competitions, discourse itself becomes subject to adjustment and iteration.

The Analysis of the School Factor in Industrial Design Competitions: 2015-2020 İMMİB Competition Student Category Winners

“…Existing literature (Kreiner 2009;Gottschling 2018;Hermand & Rajeb 2019) argues that design competitions are a unique opportunity in architecture design studio courses because they supply material for student portfolios, provide a common repository of guidelines, challenge participants to work together on complex integrated projects, develop skills in architectural augmentation and enhance communication. Wang (2019) claims that the ambiguity concerning the quality standard of design education leads the society to pay more attention to explicit achievements such as design competitions.…”

Drawing Atmosphere: A Case Study of Architectural Design for Care in Later Life

“…Our article builds on previous research that uses architectural competition entries as data (Andersson, 2015), including the designs of students (Gottschling, 2018). There is a tradition of scholarship in architectural theory that uses measured drawings, by students as well as established professionals, to engage practice with wider social theory (Sharr, 2009).…”

The Making of an Energy Renovation: Knowing & Acting on Energy-Saving Features through Design Processes

“…Neff, 2011;Koch & Beemsterboer, 2017;Neff, Fiore-Silfvast, & Dossick, 2010;Whyte & Lobo, 2010); how architectural competitions are carried out (e.g. Gottschling, 2017;Kreiner, Jacobsen, & Jensen, 2011); how engineers coordinate work across country borders (e.g. Ramalingam & Mahalingam, 2018); interactions between professionals and building users (e.g.…”