2020
DOI: 10.1177/1357034x20949934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drawing Atmosphere: A Case Study of Architectural Design for Care in Later Life

Abstract: In this article, we use an entry to an international architectural student competition on future care to explore how social norms about older bodies may be challenged by designs that are sensitive to the spatial contexts within which we age. The power of the My Home design by Witham and Wilkins derives from its hand-drawn aesthetic and thus we consider the architects’ insistence on drawing as a challenge to the clear and unambiguous image-making typically associated with digitally aided architectural designs. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particular devices are designed into carceral space, but whether they are consumed as intended highlights an even more complex amalgam of atmosphere(s) than those that architects ordinarily grapple with. What certainly hits a note in this discussion is the notion that atmosphere is a ‘heuristic device’ (Martin et al, 2020: 64) that can arguably be deployed as a powerful tool to assist designers in communicating the intentions for a particular space. In the prison environment, questions of power and powerlessness are omnipresent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular devices are designed into carceral space, but whether they are consumed as intended highlights an even more complex amalgam of atmosphere(s) than those that architects ordinarily grapple with. What certainly hits a note in this discussion is the notion that atmosphere is a ‘heuristic device’ (Martin et al, 2020: 64) that can arguably be deployed as a powerful tool to assist designers in communicating the intentions for a particular space. In the prison environment, questions of power and powerlessness are omnipresent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When architecture is instead approached as a practice involving myriad moves and counter-moves by human and nonhuman actors it becomes possible to see that ‘a building is not a static object but a moving project ’ (Latour & Yaneva, 2008, p. 80). Recognising the social and political significance of such projects (Gieryn, 2002; Jones, 2011), an emerging sociology of architecture has begun to unpack the ‘doing’ (Jacobs & Merriman, 2011) of architectural work (Buse et al, 2017; Imrie, 2007; Martin et al, forthcoming; Martin et al, 2015; Nettleton et al, 2020; Yaneva, 2005, 2009). For Ingold (2013), this begins with a shift in conceiving of architecture, moving from a focus on building as noun, in terms of physical objects, and towards an understanding of building as verb, as an unfolding process of making, involving human activities and nonhuman agencies.…”
Section: Sociology Architecture and Timementioning
confidence: 99%