2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2017.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where are they? Where will they be? In pursuit of current and future whereabouts of endangered Himalayan musk deer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to our finding, Khadka et al, 2017 found temperature play a greater role in distribution of musk deer. Therefore, Khadka et al 58 predicted (i) that vast stretches of currently suitable habitat of Himalayan musk deer exist at very high elevation including above tree line and snowline although we know that the species needs a forest to survive, and (2) that this suitable habitat expands dramatically in future to higher elevation areas without any contraction. The unrealistic future projection of musk deer by Khadka et al, 2017 has another layer of complexity: plants do not respond to newly available suitable climate above treeline and snowline because soil may not have formed in enough quantity to support the plant growth in such large area 59,60 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to our finding, Khadka et al, 2017 found temperature play a greater role in distribution of musk deer. Therefore, Khadka et al 58 predicted (i) that vast stretches of currently suitable habitat of Himalayan musk deer exist at very high elevation including above tree line and snowline although we know that the species needs a forest to survive, and (2) that this suitable habitat expands dramatically in future to higher elevation areas without any contraction. The unrealistic future projection of musk deer by Khadka et al, 2017 has another layer of complexity: plants do not respond to newly available suitable climate above treeline and snowline because soil may not have formed in enough quantity to support the plant growth in such large area 59,60 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To build the model, the authors referred to the protocols suggested by various studies (Bradie & Leung,2017;Halvorsen 2013;Kaky et al,2020;Zhang et al, 2019), and selected several basic environmental factors, including terrain, vegetation, human disturbance variables, and climate data (Table 1), which are widely available for many locations around the world. MaxENT was adopted to develop the models (Elith et al, 2011;Phillips & Dudík, 2008), as it is a widely applied method to predict species distributions and proven to be reliable for numerous taxa (Kumar & Stohlgren, 2009;Onojeghuo et al, 2015;Khadka et al, 2017;Thapa et al, 2018). Before running MaxENT, all relevant accessible factors in the dataset were given full consideration and transformed into raster format (90m × 90m), using UTM coordination system.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To build the model, the authors referred to the protocols suggested by various studies (Bradie & Leung, 2017; Halvorsen, 2013; Kaky et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2019), and selected several basic environmental factors, including terrain, vegetation, human disturbance variables, and climate data (Table 1), most of which are widely available for many locations around the world. MaxENT was adopted to develop the models (Elith et al, 2011; Phillips & Dudík, 2008), as it is a widely applied method to predict species distributions and proven to be reliable for numerous taxa (Khadka et al, 2017; Kumar & Stohlgren, 2009; Onojeghuo et al, 2015; Thapa et al, 2018). Before running MaxENT, all relevant accessible factors in the dataset were given full consideration and transformed into raster format (90 × 90 m), using UTM coordination system.…”
Section: Data Source and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%