2006
DOI: 10.1002/oa.824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where are the wolves? Investigating the scarcity of European grey wolf (Canis lupus lupus) remains in medieval archaeological contexts and its implications

Abstract: The wolf is thought to have been abundant in many parts of medieval Europe, but its remains are rarely identified in archaeological contexts. One of the potential reasons for this is the problem of distinguishing between the skeletal elements of wolves and dogs, accentuated by poor preservation and fragmentation. This paper reviews the extent of this problem, exploring the morphological relationships between wolves and dogs, as well as the issue of hybridisation, and goes on to suggest how the scarcity of wolf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The length of the upper carnassial tooth (P 4 ) of the Razboinichya canid falls within size the range for modern wolves (Table 1), although the relative length of P 4 is less than the sum of the two molars (22.9 mm; see Table S2), a value more typical of dogs than wolves [19]. The lower carnassial tooth (M 1 , GL 27.7 mm; see Table S3) falls within the lower range of values for prehistoric wolves and is only slightly smaller than modern European wolves (Table S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The length of the upper carnassial tooth (P 4 ) of the Razboinichya canid falls within size the range for modern wolves (Table 1), although the relative length of P 4 is less than the sum of the two molars (22.9 mm; see Table S2), a value more typical of dogs than wolves [19]. The lower carnassial tooth (M 1 , GL 27.7 mm; see Table S3) falls within the lower range of values for prehistoric wolves and is only slightly smaller than modern European wolves (Table S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Our research has focused on morphometric features considered as the most important for separating dogs from wolves—mandible proportions, as well as the size, position, and clustering of teeth (Benecke, ; Clark, ; Clutton‐Brock, ; Pluskowski, ). All the measurements were taken with digital caliper to 0.01 mm precision.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, tooth crowding is considered to be characteristic of early domestic dogs (Wolfgramm, 1894;Lawrence, 1967;Morey, 1992;Clutton-Brock, 1995;Pluskowski, 2006). However, exceptionally, tooth crowding occurs in wild wolves (Dolgov and Rossolimo, 1964;Buchalczyk et al, 1981;Andersone and Ozoliņ s, 2000), especially in skulls that show other anomalies (Dolgov and Rossolimo, 1964;Clutton-Brock et al, 1994;Andersone and Ozoliņ s, 2000).…”
Section: Table 11mentioning
confidence: 96%