2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When to use the projection assumption and the weak-phase object approximation in phase contrast cryo-EM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models explore how electrons interact with matter (the macromolecule and its hydration layer [51]) and finally produce an image that is recorded by the device [52], [53]. For the moment, none of the previous advances in image formation has made its way into a 3D reconstruction algorithm, but certainly having a high-resolution model of how the image is formed in the microscope is a necessary step forward.…”
Section: ) High-resolution Electron Imaging: Direct Detection Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models explore how electrons interact with matter (the macromolecule and its hydration layer [51]) and finally produce an image that is recorded by the device [52], [53]. For the moment, none of the previous advances in image formation has made its way into a 3D reconstruction algorithm, but certainly having a high-resolution model of how the image is formed in the microscope is a necessary step forward.…”
Section: ) High-resolution Electron Imaging: Direct Detection Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A weak phase (linear) approximation at each slice may also be assumed [31][32][33][34]. Scattering through a single slice is calculated by integration with the function,…”
Section: Accounting For Propagation Through the Specimen-the M-plamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under atomic-resolution imaging conditions, namely, zoneaxis orientation and evaluation of large scattering angles, the POA is usually no longer applicable for specimen thicknesses above a few nanometers for very light atomic species down to a few angstroms for medium and heavy elements [3,24,25], The wave function is modulated in amplitude and phase in a complicated manner referred to as dynamic scattering (e.g., Ref. [24]).…”
Section: B High Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24]). For instance, the strong amplitude contrast of 88% is already obtained after a 4-nm-thick GaAs layer (i.e., not a particularly strong scatterer) aligned in the [110] direction at 200-kV acceleration voltage [24], A detailed study of the range of validity of the POA was published recently [25], and we discuss this crucial point further in the Appendix. Moreover, atomic electric fields strongly vary on length scales smaller than the Bohr radius, which are smaller than the electron probe sizes typically employed in hardware-corrected STEM.…”
Section: B High Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%