When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process

Abstract

IntroductionClinical training programs increasingly use entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as focus of assessment. However, questions remain about which information should ground decisions to trust learners. This qualitative study aimed to identify decision variables in the workplace that clinical teachers find relevant in the elaboration of the entrustment decision processes. The findings can substantiate entrustment decision-making in the clinical workplace.MethodsFocus groups were conducted with medical and veterinary clinical teachers, using the structured consensus method of the Nominal Group Technique to generate decision variables. A ranking was made based on a relevance score assigned by the clinical teachers to the different decision variables. Field notes, audio recordings and flip chart lists were analyzed and subsequently translated and, as a form of axial coding, merged into one list, combining the decision variables that were similar in their meaning.ResultsA list of 11 and 17 decision variables were acknowledged as relevant by the medical and veterinary teacher groups, respectively. The focus groups yielded 21 unique decision variables that were considered relevant to inform readiness to perform a clinical task on a designated level of supervision. The decision variables consisted of skills, generic qualities, characteristics, previous performance or other information. We were able to group the decision variables into five categories: ability, humility, integrity, reliability and adequate exposure.DiscussionTo entrust a learner to perform a task at a specific level of supervision, a supervisor needs information to support such a judgement. This trust cannot be credited on a single case at a single moment of assessment, but requires different variables and multiple sources of information. This study provides an overview of decision variables giving evidence to justify the multifactorial process of making an entrustment decision.

Entrustable professional activities in health care education: a scoping review

“…Progressive entrustment is necessary to train competent and fully autonomous clinicians, and many papers sought to identify factors influencing supervisors’ entrustment decisions ( n = 7) . The main factors were trainees’ characteristics, trainees’ experiences, supervisors’ characteristics, characteristics of the task at hand and contextual factors.…”

Effectiveness of flipped classroom combined with team-, case-, lecture- and evidence-based learning on ophthalmology teaching for eight-year program students

“…As the development of higher education teaching progresses, methods increasingly emphasize the active participation of students. Moreover, due to the unique qualities of medical education, medical educators have been striving for active-learning abilities, critical thinking skills, good humanistic care, and practical capabilities [1] . Traditional lecture-based classroom (LBC) models cannot meet the needs of modern medical education [2], and thus, a variety of teaching mode reforms have emerged one after another, such as Problem-Based Learning [3], Case-Based Learning [4], Team-Based Learning [5], FC [6], and others.…”

Entrustment Ratings in Internal Medicine Training: Capturing Meaningful Supervision Decisions or Just Another Rating?

“…7 Thus, treating the entrustability assessment as an acontextual, isolated decision about the task under observation is likely misleading. 15 Fourth, internal medicine is not a culture rife with direct observation and feedback. 16 The ward-based system of learning includes regular periods when clinical supervisors are expected to be absent (e.g., nights and weekends).…”