2019
DOI: 10.1177/1069072719857174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When the Job Does Not Fit: The Moderating Role of Job Crafting and Meaningful Work in the Relation Between Employees’ Perceived Overqualification and Job Boredom

Abstract: Job boredom is a common experience at work; however, it has been neglected in research and practice compared to other well-being states. Based on the person-job fit theory, this article aims to examine the association between employees’ perceived overqualification and job boredom, analyzing potential moderators. In Study 1, we analyzed job crafting as a moderator using a sample of 832 employees from different organizations in Puerto Rico. Results supported the relation between employees’ perceived overqualific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Introduction Boredom occurs either unintentionally or intentionally but stays at work regardless of the technological innovation or changes in work. Boredom is something that cannot be avoided and is across the board (Sánchez-Cardona, Vera, Martínez-Lugo, Rodríguez-Montalbán, & Marrero-Centeno, 2020). Job boredom is a condition where an employee seems to be passive and less interested in performing day to day activities (Harju, Schaufeli, & Hakanen, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction Boredom occurs either unintentionally or intentionally but stays at work regardless of the technological innovation or changes in work. Boredom is something that cannot be avoided and is across the board (Sánchez-Cardona, Vera, Martínez-Lugo, Rodríguez-Montalbán, & Marrero-Centeno, 2020). Job boredom is a condition where an employee seems to be passive and less interested in performing day to day activities (Harju, Schaufeli, & Hakanen, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although the effect of job boredom, an unpleasant state commonly links to insufficient stimulation in the work environment (Mikulas and Vodanovich, 1993;Reijseger et al, 2013), on intensive smartphone use was well documented in the literature (Elhai et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2020), and there are relatively few studies on the association between POQ or other forms of person-job misfit and job boredom Sánchez-Cardona et al, 2020). For the following reasons, we proposed that POQ could affect intensive smartphone use through job boredom.…”
Section: Hypothesis Development the Mediating Role Of Job Boredommentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Job boredom is defined as an unpleasant and deactivated emotion, which is characterized by low arousal and dissatisfaction caused by a lack of a stimulating work environment (Reijseger et al, 2013). Given that boredom is an emotional response to a less stimulating work environment, it is usually experienced by overqualified employees (Liu and Wang, 2012;Sánchez-Cardona et al, 2020;Kim et al, 2021). Furthermore, the P-E fit theory also suggests that individuals could take some measures to cope with the negative emotions caused by person-job misfits (Kristof-Brown et al, 2005;van Vianen, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have explored the measurement methods of the meaningfulness of work ( Lysova et al, 2019 ), dimensions ( Steger et al, 2012 ), influencing factors (such as decent work and hope; Allan et al, 2019a , b ), and consequences (such as happiness, exhaustion, and engagement Martela and Pessi, 2018 ; Bailey et al, 2019 ; Vogel et al, 2020 ). Some scholars are concerned that the meaningfulness of work as a boundary condition affects the impact of context on employee’ positive behavior ( Sa’nchez-Cardona et al, 2020 ; Sawhney et al, 2020 ). However, empirical research on the role of meaningfulness of work as mediating role between distributed leadership and new generation employees’ proactive behavior is very rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%