Abstract:We report on the findings of a mixed methods longitudinal study of 84 African American fathers of young children who were enrolled into the study during the father’s jail stay. Participants were assessed using interviews, self-report measures, and administrative records on frequency of father–child contact, father–caregiver relationship quality, family support, paternal pre-incarceration employment, fathers’ plans to live with the child upon reentry, history of substance abuse, and new convictions one year fol… Show more
“…Factors, such as social support can attenuate risks faced by Black fathers, including some of the most marginalized subsets of fathers—Black nonresident fathers, and formerly incarcerated Black fathers. In fact, some research suggests that better health outcomes like reduced depressive symptoms (Tsuchiya et al, 2018), more positive reentry experiences, and lower reincarceration rates (Thomas et al, 2022) are all linked to fathers receiving high levels of positive social support.…”
Much of the early psychological research on Black fathers and families employed a deficit lens, pathologizing Black fathers as absent and uninvolved contributors to their children's development. As a response, several Black psychologists articulated the need to move away from deficitbased approaches and employ strengths-based and adaptive frameworks to examine the social experiences of Black fathers and their contributions to child development. This transformative work was not only central to advancing research on Black fathers but also a cornerstone in the broader fathering literature. Though the list of foundational architects of Black fatherhood scholarship spans disciplines, we center this article around the contributions of eight Black psychologists-Drs.
“…Factors, such as social support can attenuate risks faced by Black fathers, including some of the most marginalized subsets of fathers—Black nonresident fathers, and formerly incarcerated Black fathers. In fact, some research suggests that better health outcomes like reduced depressive symptoms (Tsuchiya et al, 2018), more positive reentry experiences, and lower reincarceration rates (Thomas et al, 2022) are all linked to fathers receiving high levels of positive social support.…”
Much of the early psychological research on Black fathers and families employed a deficit lens, pathologizing Black fathers as absent and uninvolved contributors to their children's development. As a response, several Black psychologists articulated the need to move away from deficitbased approaches and employ strengths-based and adaptive frameworks to examine the social experiences of Black fathers and their contributions to child development. This transformative work was not only central to advancing research on Black fathers but also a cornerstone in the broader fathering literature. Though the list of foundational architects of Black fatherhood scholarship spans disciplines, we center this article around the contributions of eight Black psychologists-Drs.
“…Recent work indicates that the frequency, modality, and quality of parent–child contact during parental incarceration are all important factors for both parents and children (Cramer et al, 2017). Studies focusing on incarcerated parents have found that more parent–child contact during incarceration, usually in the form of phone calls and visits, is associated with more engaged parent–child relationships during reentry, as well as better parental mental health and lower recidivism (e.g., McKay et al, 2019; Thomas et al, 2020; Visher et al, 2013). This is even true to some degree for video visits (Duwe & McNeeley, 2020).…”
Section: The Importance Of Visits and Other Forms Of Contact For Inca...mentioning
To limit the spread of the highly contagious COVID-19 virus, departments of corrections (DOCs) in all 50 states suspended in-person visits to state prisons between March 7 and March 19, 2020. This article describes changes to policies related to the contact incarcerated individuals could have with family members and others since the pandemic began. We also examine the clarity of the information presented to the public regarding COVID-19 testing and outbreaks in state prisons. The results show that DOCs quickly made free phone calls available to incarcerated individuals, although for how long this policy remained in place is unclear. The capacity for video visits during the pandemic was notably less; only 25 state DOCs had video visits in place before March 2020, and 16 of those reported adding free video visits with family members during the pandemic. A smaller proportion of states reported offering free email access (n ϭ 15) and free postage/stamps (n ϭ 10). Analysis of state DOCs' webpages showed variability in the range of information available about testing and outbreaks. The clarity of the information presented on DOCs' websites was associated with the total number of policy changes DOCs made related to other forms of contact with family members. States that made more policy changes had more accessible and informative data related to COVID-19 testing and prevalence on their webpages. These results have important implications for policy considerations related to incarcerated people's contact with their families as the pandemic continues and are discussed in light of pending legislation in the U.S. Senate.
“…This further led to the destruction of families, as women and children in low-income communities were left to cope without husbands and fathers (Western & Wildeman, 2009). The systemic oppression of African American men has led to more than 1.1 million imprisoned in the United States, with approximately 500,000 being fathers between 25-29 years of age (Modecki & Wilson, 2009;Thomas et al, 2022). In 2017, African American men were sentenced six times more than white men (Thomas et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systemic oppression of African American men has led to more than 1.1 million imprisoned in the United States, with approximately 500,000 being fathers between 25-29 years of age (Modecki & Wilson, 2009;Thomas et al, 2022). In 2017, African American men were sentenced six times more than white men (Thomas et al, 2022). In 2021, The Sentencing Project estimated that 1 in 12 African American men are in prison or jail on any given day, and 1 in 3 are at risk of going to prison in their lifetimes (The Sentencing Project, 2021).…”
Throughout history, the role of African American fathers has been plagued by oppression and persecution. As predicted by Daniel Patrick Moynihan in "The Negro Family: The Case for National Action," centuries of mistreatment and racism would plague African American families for generations and deem them in a constant state of despair and dysfunction. Relentless rhetoric about African American families and the father's role has been significant in the systemic degradation of African American men. The systemic oppression of African American men has led to more than 1.1 million imprisoned in the United States, and approximately 500,000 are fathers. Many of these fathers inherited their father's incarceration, and their children continue to fuel the cycle. For decades researchers linked the effects of parental incarceration to adverse childhood outcomes, including increased likelihood of imprisonment, particularly for African American males. Therefore, this study explored the impact of incarceration on African American fathers and their sons. The data revealed four major themes: caregiving, stigma, paternal bonds, and reentry. The findings implied that specialized knowledge through a forensic social work lens might offer more comprehensive solutions by focusing on paternal relationships, long-term consequences of incarceration, and objective criteria that can assist with treatment outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.