2011
DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2011.561124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When rules started to rule: the IMF, neo-liberal economic ideas and economic policy change in Britain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ideological interests of even the IMF, the most unequivocal exponent of 'neoliberal' economic ideas, are interwoven with its purpose as a global actor and its constraints as an international organisation (Taylor, 2004;Mueller, 2011;Clift and Tomlinson, 2012). While elements of neoliberal economic practice clearly suit the financial sector for example, capital has no inherent desire for a 'free' market and neither are there monolithic prevailing business interests that support a small state per se (see e.g.…”
Section: Neoliberalism Is Dead: Long Live Neoliberalism!mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideological interests of even the IMF, the most unequivocal exponent of 'neoliberal' economic ideas, are interwoven with its purpose as a global actor and its constraints as an international organisation (Taylor, 2004;Mueller, 2011;Clift and Tomlinson, 2012). While elements of neoliberal economic practice clearly suit the financial sector for example, capital has no inherent desire for a 'free' market and neither are there monolithic prevailing business interests that support a small state per se (see e.g.…”
Section: Neoliberalism Is Dead: Long Live Neoliberalism!mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, while other recent scholarship notes that policy change often occurs incrementally within IOs (Clift and Tomlinson 2012;Moschella 2012), this article strengthens our understanding of it by identifying a set of scope conditions when it is likely to occur. Using insights from historical institutionalism, it also breaks new ground by exploring layering, a mechanism previously neglected in existing accounts of policy change originating from within IOs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Path-dependent cultural barriers then constrain how intra-organisational contestation induces change, but at the same time tensions within an organisation's culture, like those within institutions (Pierson 2004: ch. 4), make it open to debates about interpretation and application thus providing space for change (Jabko 2007;Clift and Tomlinson 2012). Layering provides internal entrepreneurs with a way to respond to these opportunities and constraints.…”
Section: Transformative Incremental Change From Within Iosmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Public policy instruments 'produce specific effects, independently of the objective pursued (the aims ascribed to them)' (Lascoumes & Le Galès, 2007, 3) Policy instruments address policy issues in particular ways (Clift & Tomlinson, 2011) and 'generate their own effects' (Newman, 2009, 3).…”
Section: An Instrumental Approach To Investigate the Self-realisationmentioning
confidence: 99%