2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Mendelian randomisation fails

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To explore the causal role of vitamin D in COVID-19 risk, there have been at least three Mendelian Randomisation studies using the genetic variants associated with serum 25OHD as instrumental variables [6][7][8] . It is shown that genetic predisposition for lower levels of vitamin D is not causally associated with infection from SARS-CoV-2 or severe COVID-19 disease [6][7][8][9] . It is important to note that genetic heritability of vitamin D status is high in winter, but in the summer the vitamin D status might be predominantly determined by environmental factors regulating exposure (including season, geographical latitude) to ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation 10 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore the causal role of vitamin D in COVID-19 risk, there have been at least three Mendelian Randomisation studies using the genetic variants associated with serum 25OHD as instrumental variables [6][7][8] . It is shown that genetic predisposition for lower levels of vitamin D is not causally associated with infection from SARS-CoV-2 or severe COVID-19 disease [6][7][8][9] . It is important to note that genetic heritability of vitamin D status is high in winter, but in the summer the vitamin D status might be predominantly determined by environmental factors regulating exposure (including season, geographical latitude) to ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation 10 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One application of genetically modulated nutrition status is as instrumental variables for Mendelian Randomisation to examine whether the nutrition status impacts particular disease outcomes. [7][8][9] As soon as substantial and corroborated evidence emerges for a particular variable that indicates the stratification of a nutritional response, there is no going back to the assumption of uniform behaviour. Whether the candidate variant ends up being causal itself or linked to another, ultimately causal variant is of lesser importance in this context.…”
Section: Martin Kohlmeiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most of the nutritional relationships with a significant genetic component,6 impactful categorical variables remain hidden in the jungle of other common genetic variants, often involving multiple loci or genes and typically hundreds of variants across each of them. One application of genetically modulated nutrition status is as instrumental variables for Mendelian Randomisation to examine whether the nutrition status impacts particular disease outcomes 7–9…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vitamin D status of otherwise healthy individuals is strongly influenced by habitual sun exposure and skin pigmentation [4]. Genetic factors also appear to have a significant impact, particularly in carriers of the common GC rs4588 genotype TT associated with lower vitamin D status [5]. Obese individuals tend to have poorer vitamin D status as do people living at high latitude (Canada, UK, Central and Northern Europe).…”
Section: Essential Nutrients For a Balanced Immune Responsementioning
confidence: 99%