2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11133-015-9304-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Less is More: On Time Work in Long-Distance Relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This points to the crucial role of argumentative use or manipulation of time in advancing and defending knowledge claims. In its original formulation, the concept of time work, understood as “one’s effort to promote or suppress a particular temporal experience” ( Flaherty, 2003 , p. 19), sheds light on how people attempt to control or customize various dimensions of time in diverse social contexts ( Flaherty, 2011 ; Dalsgård et al, 2014 ; Flaherty et al, 2020 ), from managing health care ( McCoy, 2009 ) to homeschooling ( Lois, 2010 ) or to maintaining long distance relationships ( Jurkane-Hobein, 2015 ). The concept of argumentative time work ( Ciocănel et al, 2020 ; Rughiniş et al, 2020 ) reveals legitimation tactics that make use of shared temporal expectations and valorizations to create plausible representations of reality.…”
Section: A Conceptual Template That Accounts For the Social Bifurcati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This points to the crucial role of argumentative use or manipulation of time in advancing and defending knowledge claims. In its original formulation, the concept of time work, understood as “one’s effort to promote or suppress a particular temporal experience” ( Flaherty, 2003 , p. 19), sheds light on how people attempt to control or customize various dimensions of time in diverse social contexts ( Flaherty, 2011 ; Dalsgård et al, 2014 ; Flaherty et al, 2020 ), from managing health care ( McCoy, 2009 ) to homeschooling ( Lois, 2010 ) or to maintaining long distance relationships ( Jurkane-Hobein, 2015 ). The concept of argumentative time work ( Ciocănel et al, 2020 ; Rughiniş et al, 2020 ) reveals legitimation tactics that make use of shared temporal expectations and valorizations to create plausible representations of reality.…”
Section: A Conceptual Template That Accounts For the Social Bifurcati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results suggest that both partners' satisfaction with their shared leisure pursuits should be a greater focus than purely the amount of time they spend together, as more is not always better. Supporting this claim, recent studies investigating the maintenance and satisfaction in long‐distance relationships suggest that time, in romantic contexts, is often subjective, further negating the impact of actual time quantity on relationship functioning (Jurkane‐Hobein, ; Sahlstein, ). Dissatisfaction with the time spent with the partner, however, will have negative implications for relationship functioning, despite the amount of time being shared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gerstel and Gross (1984) suggest that the time period of at least 1 month is appropriate for considering a relationship to be long-distance, although what can also matter is if the partners sense that the subjective time without seeing each other is too long (Jurkane-Hobein, 2015; Stafford, 2005). With both of these interpretations of the amount of time that needs to pass in order for a relationship to be considered long-distance in mind, respondents were asked, “Roughly how long was this long-distance period in the relationship?” The choices that were made available to respondents in a pull-down menu were collapsed during data analysis into broad temporal categories of less than 6 months, between 6 months and a year, and at least a year.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%