Reproductive Science and Integrated Conservation 2002
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511615016.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When is the birth rate the key factor associated with population dynamics?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, there is little evidence that either of the previous generalizations (Gaillard et al . 2000; Coulson & Hudson 2003) is supported. Fourth, any decomposition of variation in population growth should consider covariation between demographic rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, there is little evidence that either of the previous generalizations (Gaillard et al . 2000; Coulson & Hudson 2003) is supported. Fourth, any decomposition of variation in population growth should consider covariation between demographic rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The generalizations proposed by Gaillard et al . (2000) and Coulson & Hudson (2003) were based on studies that ignored covariation between demographic rates. Before any new generalizations can be proposed further studies examining the association between demographic rate covariation and variation in population growth are required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density dependence primarily in adult survival was previously noted also for African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in Serengeti (Sinclair 1973), and zebra (Equus burchelli) and giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) in Kruger . The rise in adult mortality toward high density was largely an outcome of increased mortality among older females, coupled with a shift in population structure toward older animals, in populations where prime and old females could be differentiated (e.g., kudu, Owen-Smith 1990; red deer, Coulson and Hudson 2003;bighorn sheep, Festa-Bianchet et al 2003). Nevertheless, a density effect on mortality among prime-aged females was detectable for kudu, albeit more weakly.…”
Section: Density-related Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that variable juvenile survival is mainly responsible for causing population size to vary, as well as for densityrelated feedbacks restricting population fluctuations. However, these outcomes may be contingent upon the ecological circumstances (Owen-Smith and , and differ between phases of population growth (Coulson and Hudson 2003). Furthermore, the changing age structure of the population has additional effects on the realized population growth rate, with old animals having lowered survival forming a greater proportion as the net growth rate slows (Festa-Bianchet et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 al. Prior to 1972 the population was limited by culling; during the period of population increase, the predominant limiting factor was the birth rate; but since the population reached ecological carrying capacity, the population has been food limited (Clutton-Brock et al 1985, Albon et al 2000, Coulson and Hudson 2003, with starvation being the predominant cause of death (Clutton-Brock et al 1997a). Prior to 1972 the population was predominantly limited by hunting, with an unselected ϳ14% of females and males removed annually (Clutton-Brock et al 1985, 2002, Milner-Gulland et al 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%