2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2008.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When is ‘race’ a race? 1946–2003

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, strong continuities can also be the product of structurally similar responses. For example, consider that not only Austrian and German but also Israeli public discourse tends to prefer eliminativist interpretations of race (Gissis 2008) due to structurally similar reflections on role of racial ideology in the Holocaust. Furthermore, consider appeals to black culture in black nationalism in the United States and in black consciousness in South Africa.…”
Section: A Framework For Relating Racial Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, strong continuities can also be the product of structurally similar responses. For example, consider that not only Austrian and German but also Israeli public discourse tends to prefer eliminativist interpretations of race (Gissis 2008) due to structurally similar reflections on role of racial ideology in the Holocaust. Furthermore, consider appeals to black culture in black nationalism in the United States and in black consciousness in South Africa.…”
Section: A Framework For Relating Racial Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific practices involved in research on race and ethnicity in health and genomics have been shown to be situated in and shaped by various specific national, sociopolitical, and historical contexts (Hinterberger, 2012;Epstein, 2010;Tsai, 2010;Olarte Sierra and Díaz Del Castillo Herná ndez, 2014). These national, sociopolitical, and historical contexts shape the ways in which ethnicity and race are enacted in research by prescribing, for example, the (official) categories which must be used in research -a process referred to as ''categorical alignment'' (Epstein, 2007) -or by defining which groups are and are not considered to be ethnic and racial minorities (Gissis, 2008;Helberg-Proctor et al, 2016, 2017Proctor et al, 2011). Scientific practices involved in research on race and ethnicity in health and genomics have also been shown to be situated in the specific dynamics of a ''research situation'' (Shim et al, 2014), whereby dynamics unique to a specific research situation, such as the availability of data and sufficient sample sizes per ethnic and or racial group and the specific aims of a project, shape the manner in which ethnicity and race are enacted (Shim et al, 2014;Helberg-Proctor et al, 2016).…”
Section: Researching Ethnicity In the Context Of Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the resurgence of "race" in biomedical research suggests that many researchers use "race" in ways that match neither traditional subspecies nor ecotypes (cf. Root 2003;Torres and Kittles 2007;Gissis 2008). Unless we assume that classifications in all disciplines of the life sciences must be taxonomically relevant for biological systematics, the problem of multiple specifications of "race" reappears in our discussion of race scientific (cf.…”
Section: What Are Allowable Revisions Of "Race"?mentioning
confidence: 99%